Blog

#ReclaimTemples•Blog

Agrasen Ki Baoli

Agrasen Ki Baoli: An Ancient Reservoir with a Mysterious Past

Tucked away amidst the modern skyline of New Delhi, Agrasen Ki Baoli is a stunning yet enigmatic stepwell that echoes the architectural grandeur of a bygone era. This ancient structure, located on Hailey Road near Connaught Place, is a historical marvel that has sparked numerous speculations about its origins. While officially attributed to Maharaja Agrasen, a legendary king from the Mahabharata era, the present structure is believed to have been rebuilt during the 14th or 15th century by the Agrawal community. However, certain architectural elements hint at an even older, possibly Hindu temple influence, raising the question: Could Agrasen Ki Baoli have been a sacred Hindu site before evolving into a functional stepwell?

Architectural Brilliance of Agrasen Ki Baoli

Agrasen Ki Baoli is an architectural gem, featuring 103 stone steps that lead down to the now-dried reservoir. The rectangular structure measures approximately 60 meters in length and 15 meters in width, exhibiting a sophisticated multi-tiered design with arched niches and chambers on either side. The structure is composed of three levels of arched corridors, providing an eerie yet captivating visual experience as one descends towards its depths.

Key Architectural Features:

  1. Stepped Reservoir: The main feature of the baoli is its series of descending steps, allowing access to the water source regardless of seasonal changes in water levels.
  2. Ornate Pillars and Niches: The walls of the baoli are adorned with intricately carved niches and alcoves, some of which bear resemblance to Hindu temple mandapas (pillared halls) commonly found in ancient temples.
  3. Floral and Geometric Motifs: The carvings on the baoli’s walls showcase lotus patterns and floral engravings, both significant symbols in Hinduism.
  4. Arched Chambers: While the pointed arches on the walls are reminiscent of Indo-Islamic influences from the later periods, the presence of certain semi-circular arch designs aligns more closely with Hindu and Jain architectural traditions.
  5. Presence of a Shrine: Some historical accounts and local lore suggest that a small shrine or temple once existed within the baoli premises, potentially indicating its earlier use as a religious site before being converted into a utilitarian structure.

Hindu Temple Influences in Agrasen Ki Baoli

Despite being labeled a medieval stepwell, certain elements suggest the baoli may have had religious significance in the pre-Islamic era:

  1. Symmetry and Vastu Alignment: Traditional Hindu water structures, like temple tanks and stepwells, were built in strict accordance with Vastu Shastra, ensuring harmony with the natural elements. Agrasen Ki Baoli’s geometric precision and alignment with cardinal directions strongly indicate adherence to these ancient architectural principles.
  2. Sculptural Relics: While many of the original carvings have been eroded over time, faint traces of Hindu deities or auspicious symbols have been reported in historical studies.
  3. Connection to Sacred Water Bodies: Water has always played a crucial role in Hindu religious practices, and stepwells were often attached to temples or pilgrimage sites to facilitate ritualistic bathing and water conservation. Agrasen Ki Baoli’s grand scale and careful construction suggest it may have served a similar purpose before being repurposed.
  4. Legends of King Agrasen: The baoli’s association with Maharaja Agrasen, a ruler linked to Sanatan Dharma and Vedic traditions, strengthens the theory that this site originally had religious significance.

Possible origins of the Ancient Site

Several factors contribute to the hypothesis that Agrasen Ki Baoli may have been a sacred Hindu site before being repurposed:

  • Cultural Transition Over Centuries: Delhi has witnessed multiple dynastic transitions, from Hindu rulers to Turkic and Mughal invaders. Many Hindu structures were modified, repurposed, or overlaid with newer architectural elements.
  • Islamic conversions of Hindu Stepwells: Several stepwells across North India, originally built by Hindu kings, were later used or renovated by invaded rulers. The addition of Islamic-style arches at Agrasen Ki Baoli suggests later modifications rather than an original feature.
  • Absence of Inscriptions: Unlike most Mughal-era constructions, which prominently feature Persian calligraphy, Agrasen Ki Baoli lacks any clear inscriptions attributing it to a specific ancient ruler, reinforcing the possibility that its origins predate Islamic rule in Delhi.

Conclusion

The key factor of this article is to understand the origins of the Ancient monument and to understand if any possible conversions of the site is discovered. 
Agrasen Ki Baoli stands as an architectural enigma, seamlessly blending elements of Hindu, Jain, and later Islamic styles. While its functional role as a stepwell is undisputed, the presence of Hindu architectural motifs, its alignment with Vastu principles, and the legends surrounding its origins all fuel speculation that it was once a sacred Hindu site. Whether it was a temple tank, a spiritual retreat, or simply a grand water reservoir, its past remains shrouded in mystery. More archaeological and historical research may yet unveil the deeper secrets of this Ancient Baoli.

Isa Khan’s Tomb (Humayun Complex)

Isa Khan’s Tomb: A Forgotten Relic of the Past

Nestled within the grand Humayun’s Tomb complex in Delhi, Isa Khan’s Tomb stands as an overlooked yet historically significant monument. Believed to date back to the late 16th century, during the Mughal era. While widely recognized as an Islamic funerary structure, its architectural elements hint at an intriguing past, suggesting that it may have been built over or incorporated elements from a pre-existing Hindu site.

Architectural Features of Afsarwala Tomb

The Isa Khan’s Tomb follows the typical Mughal architectural style, characterized by a domed structure, intricate stucco work, and finely-carved sandstone elements. The tomb is accompanied by a mosque, enhancing the spiritual significance of the site. Despite its Mughal identity, closer examination of its design and ornamentation reveals unexpected Hindu temple influences.

Key Architectural Elements:

  1. Domed Structure with Islamic Calligraphy: The tomb features a single massive dome, a signature feature of Mughal architecture. Calligraphic inscriptions can be found on its walls, adding to its Islamic character.
  2. Ornate Entranceway and Facade: The entryway, adorned with decorative motifs, combines geometric Islamic patterns with floral designs that bear a striking resemblance to those seen in Hindu temples.
  3. Mihrab and Mosque: The adjacent mosque, which aligns with Mecca, is similar in design to other Mughal-era mosques, featuring arched niches and prayer halls.

Hindu Architectural Influences in Isa Khan’s Tomb

Despite its clear Mughal lineage, certain architectural elements raise speculation about the site’s origins:

  1. Carved Brackets and Pillars: The overhanging eaves (chhajjas) and stone brackets supporting them resemble those found in Hindu temples, where they were used to provide structural stability and decorative appeal.
  2. Floral and Lotus Motifs: The presence of lotus carvings, a key symbol in Hindu iconography, suggests either an adaptation from an earlier temple or the involvement of indigenous craftsmen familiar with Hindu temple designs.
  3. Use of Spolia (Repurposed Temple Materials): Some pillars and ornamental friezes display carvings reminiscent of pre-Islamic Indian architecture, hinting at the possibility that elements of an earlier Hindu or Jain structure were reused in the tomb’s construction.

  4. Presence of a Well: A significant feature of the tomb premises is an old well near the mosque. Wells were often associated with Hindu temple complexes for ritualistic purposes, raising further speculation about the site’s original use before its transformation into an Islamic funerary monument.

Possibility of a Pre-existing Hindu Site

Several factors contribute to the speculation that the Isa Khan’s Tomb may have been constructed over a Hindu religious site:

  • Historical Patterns of Temple Destruction and Reuse: The Mughals, like their predecessors, often repurposed materials from older Hindu temples when constructing new buildings. The integration of Hindu motifs in an otherwise Islamic structure suggests such a possibility.
  • Location within a Sacred Landscape: Before the Mughal period, Delhi had a rich history of Hindu and Jain temples. Given its proximity to the Yamuna River and other ancient sites, this location may have once been of religious importance.
  • Structural Discrepancies: Some of the tomb’s elements, particularly certain stone placements and carvings, do not align perfectly with traditional Mughal architectural principles, suggesting the adaptation of pre-existing structures rather than an entirely new build.

Conclusion

The Isa Khan’s Tomb is an intriguing piece of Delhi’s architectural puzzle, embodying the fusion of Islamic and indigenous Indian artistic traditions. While officially recognized as a Mughal-era funerary structure, its Hindu architectural elements hint at a deeper, possibly pre-existing history. Whether this site originally housed a Hindu temple remains uncertain, but its design details and construction materials leave room for speculation. Further archaeological and historical research could unveil more secrets, shedding light on yet another forgotten chapter of India’s syncretic heritage.

Shesh Gumbad and Bada Gumbad: Lodhi Garden

Shesh Gumbad and Bada Gumbad: Echoes of a Forgotten Past

In the heart of Delhi’s Lodhi Gardens stand two striking yet enigmatic monuments—Shesh Gumbad and Bada Gumbad. These structures, built during the late 15th and early 16th centuries under the Lodi dynasty, are remarkable examples of Indo-Islamic architecture. While traditionally considered tombs or mosque-related structures, their design elements suggest a deeper, more complex history. The presence of Hindu temple architectural motifs raises intriguing questions: Could these monuments have been constructed over an ancient Hindu site? Were elements of pre-existing structures repurposed into their design? These questions remain unanswered, adding an air of mystery to these silent sentinels of history.

Bada Gumbad: A Grand Architectural Statement

Bada Gumbad, literally translating to “Big Dome,” is one of the most imposing structures in Lodhi Gardens. Built during the reign of Sikandar Lodi (1489–1517), it consists of a large domed structure, an attached mosque, and a gateway. Though often assumed to be a tomb, no grave has been discovered inside, leading to speculation about its original purpose.

Key Architectural Features:

  1. Massive Dome and Square Base: The structure follows a square plan, crowned with a hemispherical dome, a hallmark of Indo-Islamic architecture.

  2. Ornate Facade: The western wall of the adjacent mosque is elaborately decorated with geometric and floral motifs, reminiscent of Persian influences.

  3. Jali Screens and Arches: The presence of perforated stone screens (jali) suggests both Islamic and indigenous Indian influences.

Hindu Architectural Influences in Bada Gumbad:

  1. Bracketed Chhajjas (Overhanging Eaves): The stone eaves, supported by brackets, closely resemble those seen in Hindu temple construction.

  2. Lotus and Floral Motifs: While floral patterns are common in Islamic art, the specific use of lotus imagery hints at an adaptation from Hindu traditions.

  3. Chhatris and Pillared Elements: Though largely an Islamic structure, some remnants of Hindu-style pavilions (chhatris) and stone pillars can be identified, suggesting either adaptation from a prior structure or the influence of indigenous artisans.

Shesh Gumbad: A Tomb Shrouded in Mystery

Standing close to Bada Gumbad, Shesh Gumbad is another intriguing structure, believed to house the remains of an unknown noble from the Lodi era. Unlike other Lodi tombs, its identity and history remain obscure.

Architectural Highlights:

  1. Octagonal Tomb Design: Unlike Bada Gumbad’s square plan, Shesh Gumbad follows an octagonal layout, which is commonly seen in both Indo-Islamic and Hindu temple architecture.

  2. Carved Brackets and Eaves: The intricate stone supports beneath the eaves resemble those found in medieval Hindu temples.

  3. Multi-layered Ornamentation: Some patterns on the facade bear an uncanny resemblance to temple carvings, raising the possibility that the structure incorporates repurposed materials from an earlier site.

Possibility of a Pre-existing Hindu Structure

The subtle yet undeniable Hindu architectural influences in both Gumbads invite speculation:

  • Material Reuse: Many Indo-Islamic structures in Delhi incorporate stones and pillars from demolished Hindu and Jain temples. The presence of Hindu-inspired brackets and motifs suggests the possibility of reused elements.
  • Sacred Geography: Before the Islamic period, Delhi was home to numerous Hindu temples and sacred sites. The Lodhi Gardens area may have once been a spiritual or cultural center.
  • Structural Anomalies: The orientation and design of certain architectural elements do not align perfectly with typical Islamic tomb structures, leading to theories of adaptation rather than original construction.

Conclusion

The Bada Gumbad and Shesh Gumbad stand as intriguing relics of Delhi’s architectural past, embodying a blend of Islamic and indigenous Indian design. While their official history places them within the framework of Lodi-era tombs and mosques, their Hindu architectural elements spark curiosity about their origins. Whether they were built upon a pre-existing Hindu site remains uncertain, but their fusion of styles highlights the syncretic nature of India’s rich architectural heritage. Further archaeological investigations could provide deeper insights into these forgotten layers of history, helping us unravel the true story behind these enigmatic monuments.

Sikandar Lodi’s Tomb in Lodhi Gardens

Sikandar Lodi’s Tomb in Lodhi Gardens: A Historical and Architectural Analysis 

Sikandar Lodi’s Tomb, located in Delhi’s famous Lodhi Gardens, is a remarkable example of Indo-Islamic funerary architecture from the late 15th and early 16th centuries. Built by Ibrahim Lodi in 1517 to honour his father, Sikandar Lodi, this tomb reflects a blend of Persian and indigenous Indian architectural traditions. While the tomb primarily follows the Islamic architectural style characteristic of the Lodi dynasty, certain elements suggest subtle influences from Hindu temple architecture. This raises the intriguing question of whether the site held historical significance before the tomb’s construction, possibly as a Hindu sacred space.

Architectural Features of Sikandar Lodi’s Tomb

The tomb is an early example of an enclosed garden tomb, a concept that would later be refined in Mughal architecture, particularly in Humayun’s Tomb and the Taj Mahal. Its defining features include:

1. Enclosed Garden Layout (Charbagh Influence)

Unlike earlier tombs, Sikandar Lodi’s Tomb is situated within a walled enclosure, giving it a fortress-like appearance. This is an early adaptation of the Persian Charbagh garden-tomb concept, which was later perfected by the Mughals. The use of enclosed spaces was also a feature of Hindu temple precincts, which were often surrounded by boundary walls and gateways.

2. Octagonal Tomb Structure

The tomb follows an octagonal plan, a hallmark of Lodi-era architecture. The octagonal shape was favoured for its symbolic significance in Islamic geometry, but it also has parallels in Hindu temple architecture, where sacred spaces were often designed using geometric precision.

3. Chhatris (Domed Pavilions)

One of the most distinctively Indian elements in the tomb’s design is the presence of chhatris (small domed pavilions) on its roof and exterior walls. Chhatris are an integral feature of Rajput and Hindu temple architecture, commonly used to adorn temples, cenotaphs, and palatial structures. Their presence in an Islamic tomb suggests a cultural fusion that was characteristic of Indo-Islamic architectural evolution.

4. Ornamental Brackets and Overhanging Eaves (Chhajjas)

The overhanging eaves, supported by carved stone brackets, are another feature commonly associated with Hindu and Rajput architecture. In Hindu temples, such brackets were intricately carved and used to support balconies and roofs. In Sikandar Lodi’s Tomb, these brackets, though simpler in execution, serve a similar structural and decorative function.

5. Decorative Motifs and Indigenous Craftsmanship

The tomb is relatively austere in terms of ornamentation, following the Lodi preference for simplicity. However, some floral and geometric motifs carved into the stonework resemble patterns found in Hindu temple architecture. This suggests that local artisans, skilled in temple construction, may have contributed to the tomb’s design.

Interior of the Tomb

The interior of Sikandar Lodi’s Tomb is relatively unadorned, in keeping with the minimalist style of the Lodi dynasty. The main chamber houses the cenotaph of Sikandar Lodi, while the actual grave is believed to be underground. The walls are plain, lacking the elaborate calligraphy and tile work seen in later Mughal tombs. The tomb’s simplicity contrasts with the more ornate interiors of earlier Indo-Islamic structures, reinforcing its transitional nature between the Delhi Sultanate and Mughal architectural traditions.

Was There a Hindu Site Before the Tomb?

The presence of Hindu architectural elements, while not conclusive, sparks speculation about whether the site originally held a Hindu temple or another sacred structure. Several historical factors support this possibility:

  1. Historical Precedent of Site Repurposing: The Delhi Sultanate and later rulers often built mosques and tombs over pre-existing Hindu and Jain temples, either repurposing materials or demolishing structures to assert dominance.
  2. Chhatris and Brackets: The use of these features suggests either direct adaptation from existing structures or an attempt to blend Hindu architectural elements into Islamic designs, possibly to integrate local craftsmanship.
  3. Absence of Documented Pre-Islamic Structures: While there are no clear historical records of a Hindu temple at this location, the broader Lodhi Gardens area was part of Delhi’s ancient settlements, where Hindu religious structures would have been present before Islamic rule.
  4. Sacred Geography: Many tombs and mosques in medieval India were deliberately built over sacred Hindu sites to recontextualize their religious significance. Given the strategic and central location of Sikandar Lodi’s Tomb, it is plausible that the area once held a Hindu or Jain shrine.

Conclusion

Sikandar Lodi’s Tomb is a fascinating blend of Islamic and indigenous architectural traditions, reflecting the transitional phase between the Delhi Sultanate and Mughal styles. While its core structure adheres to Lodi-era Islamic design, the presence of Hindu elements like chhatris, ornamental brackets, and decorative motifs hints at either an intentional fusion of styles or a deeper historical connection to a pre-Islamic past. Whether the site originally housed a Hindu structure remains speculative, but the architectural dialogue between different cultural traditions makes Sikandar Lodi’s Tomb an important monument in understanding India’s syncretic heritage. Further archaeological investigations could potentially shed more light on the true origins of this historic site.

Muhammad Shah’s Tomb (Lodhi Garden)

Muhammad Shah’s Tomb in Lodhi Gardens: An Architectural and Historical Inquiry

Muhammad Shah IV’s tomb, an elegant yet lesser-explored monument in Delhi’s famous Lodhi Gardens, stands as a remarkable example of Indo-Islamic architecture. Built in the mid-15th century during the Sayyid dynasty (1414–1451), the tomb commemorates Sultan Muhammad Shah, one of the last rulers of the Sayyid dynasty. The structure’s design is not purely Islamic; rather, it incorporates several elements that are reminiscent of Hindu temple architecture. This intriguing blend raises the question of whether the tomb was constructed over an older Hindu site, a possibility that remains a topic of historical speculation.

Architectural Features

Muhammad Shah’s Tomb follows the traditional Indo-Islamic style but introduces key architectural elements that distinguish it from later tombs built during the Lodi and Mughal periods. The monument’s most defining features include:

1. Octagonal Layout

The tomb follows an octagonal plan, a characteristic of Sayyid and early Lodi tombs, unlike the square tombs favored during the later Mughal period. Each side features large arched entrances, allowing light and air to flow through the structure.

2. Chhatris (Domed Pavilions)

The tomb is crowned by a large central dome, surrounded by eight small chhatris placed symmetrically at the corners. Chhatris are a distinct feature of Rajput and Hindu temple architecture, often seen in traditional temple designs and cenotaphs. Their presence in an Islamic tomb suggests an architectural syncretism or the adaptation of indigenous styles into Islamic structures.

3. Ornamental Brackets and Overhanging Eaves (Chhajjas)

The overhanging eaves (chhajjas) of the tomb are supported by stone brackets, a feature heavily inspired by Hindu and Rajput architecture. Hindu temples frequently use such carved brackets to support projecting balconies and roofs. This stylistic adaptation can be seen in many Indo-Islamic monuments, but its prominence in Muhammad Shah’s tomb is particularly noteworthy.

4. Decorative Motifs and Carvings

While the tomb largely follows Islamic artistic traditions, certain decorative motifs—such as floral and geometric patterns—bear a resemblance to carvings found in Hindu temples. Some of these motifs are not strictly Islamic, which suggests the influence of local artisans accustomed to working on Hindu religious structures.

5. Interior Design and Ornamentation

The interior of Muhammad Shah’s Tomb maintains an austere yet elegant design. The walls are largely unadorned, except for traces of faded frescoes and calligraphy that once decorated the space. The main chamber houses the central cenotaph, which is believed to be a symbolic resting place, while the actual burial chamber lies underground—a common practice in Islamic tomb architecture. The use of perforated stone screens (jali) for ventilation and lighting enhances the ethereal atmosphere within the tomb. These jali patterns, though typically Islamic, also resemble latticework found in Hindu temple designs. The domed ceiling, though simple, may have once featured painted or stucco embellishments, which time has largely erased.

Historical Speculations: Was There a Hindu Structure Before the Tomb?

The presence of Hindu-inspired elements in the tomb has led to speculations that the site might have originally housed a Hindu temple or another significant Hindu structure. Several points support this theory:

  1. Architectural Adaptation: Many Indo-Islamic buildings were constructed over pre-existing Hindu or Jain temples, often repurposing materials and incorporating local architectural elements. The use of Hindu-style chhatris and brackets suggests a possible continuity of local construction practices.

  2. Material Reuse: Some Islamic monuments in India have been known to incorporate stones and carvings from demolished temples. Though no direct evidence has been found at Muhammad Shah’s Tomb, a detailed archaeological survey could provide insights into whether existing materials were reused.


  3. Sacred Geography: The Lodhi Gardens area, which was once part of an extensive necropolis, might have held earlier religious significance. It is not uncommon for Islamic rulers to build monuments over sacred sites to assert dominance and repurpose the location for their own cultural and religious expressions.


  4. Absence of Contemporary Hindu Records: There is a lack of direct historical records mentioning a temple at this specific location before the tomb’s construction. However, the broader region of Delhi had numerous temples during the pre-Islamic period, making the possibility of an earlier Hindu structure plausible.


Conclusion

Muhammad Shah’s Tomb stands as an architectural testament to the cultural syncretism of medieval India. While its core design is rooted in Indo-Islamic traditions, its Hindu temple-inspired elements add an intriguing layer of historical complexity. Whether these features were purely stylistic choices or evidence of an older Hindu site remains an open question. Further archaeological studies and historical research could shed light on the true origins of this fascinating monument. Regardless of its past, the tomb remains a symbol of the fluid architectural and cultural exchanges that define India’s rich heritage.

Chausath Yogini, Hirapur, Odisha

 

The Chausath Yogini Temple in Hirapur, Odisha, is a remarkable yet enigmatic structure that stands as a testament to the unique spiritual and architectural heritage of ancient India. Located just 15 kilometers from Bhubaneswar, the temple stands as a rare example of India’s sacred spaces dedicated to the worship of the Yoginis—a group of 64 female deities associated with Tantric traditions. Built in the 9th century during the rule of the Bhauma-Kara dynasty, the temple invites visitors to explore its mystical aura and its unique contributions to Indian history.

Architectural Features

The 64 Yoginis are an extraordinary assembly of divine energy, rooted in the eight principal forms of Devi, the supreme Mother Goddess. These forms—Brahmani, Vaishnavi, Maheshwari, Indrani, Kaumari, Varahi, Chamunda, and Narsimhi—each command eight attendants, creating a powerful collective of 64 sacred manifestations.

This temple wasn’t discovered until 1953, when archaeologist and historian Kedarnath Mohapatra of Odisha State Museum came across the sandstone blocks of a ruined temple. It was subsequently pieced back together, giving us a circular roofless (hypaethral) structure with provision for the images of 64 female divinities within, symbolizing a cosmic connection between the earthly and the divine. This circular sanctum, only 25 feet in diameter, is built with locally sourced sandstone and houses 64 chambers along its inner wall. Each chamber contains an intricately carved idol of a Yogini, though many have been damaged over the centuries. These Yoginis are depicted in various postures, holding weapons, musical instruments, or performing dances, reflecting their multifaceted roles as warriors, musicians, and dancers. Some figures are serene, while others exude fierceness, showcasing the dual nature of divine femininity.

At the center of the temple’s courtyard stands a small shrine dedicated to Lord Shiva. This central placement underscores the connection between the Yoginis and Shaivism, as they are often considered manifestations of Shakti, the feminine divine energy, serving as consorts or attendants to Lord Shiva. The interplay of the Yoginis and Shiva represents the union of cosmic forces, highlighting the temple’s profound spiritual significance.

According to legend, the origin of the enigmatic Yogini temple at Hirapur is tied to a fierce battle. The story goes that Goddess Durga transformed herself into 64 Yoginis to vanquish a mighty demon. Triumphant, the Yoginis appealed to Durga to honor their unity and strength by creating a temple shrine where their essence could forever be celebrated.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The Chausath Yogini Temple at Hirapur is believed to have been constructed during the 9th century, a time when Tantric practices were flourishing in India. The Bhauma-Kara dynasty, known for its patronage of Tantric Buddhism and Shaivism, likely commissioned the temple as a sacred space for esoteric rituals and meditative practices. Historical records suggest that this dynasty played a key role in promoting religious inclusivity, blending Tantric traditions with mainstream Hindu practices.

Yogini worship is rooted in the Tantric belief system, which emphasizes the union of masculine and feminine energies for spiritual awakening. The Yoginis are revered as powerful goddesses who control various aspects of the universe, such as time, space, and elemental forces. This belief underscores the temple’s purpose as a center for harnessing divine energies to achieve higher states of consciousness. The open-air design of the temple is thought to facilitate the absorption of cosmic energy during rituals, aligning the devotees with the universal consciousness and fostering a connection to the infinite.

Mystical Associations

The number 64 holds immense significance in Tantric traditions, symbolizing completeness and the cyclical nature of time. The temple’s circular layout mirrors the mandala, a spiritual and ritual symbol representing the universe. Some scholars suggest that the Chausath Yogini Temple served as an initiation site for Tantric practitioners, where secret rites and ceremonies were conducted to invoke the Yoginis’ blessings. These rituals may have included meditation, chants, and symbolic offerings to awaken the divine energy within.

Interestingly, the Yoginis’ representation as fierce yet nurturing deities also reflects a deeper philosophical understanding of the dualities of life—creation and destruction, fear and compassion, power and grace. This duality resonates with the concept of balance in the Tantric worldview, where opposites coexist to create harmony in the universe.

Preservation, Neglect, and Legacy

Over centuries, the Chausath Yogini Temple at Hirapur fell into disrepair, like many other Tantric sites across India. Rediscovered in the 19th century by a British archaeologist, it was subsequently preserved as a protected monument by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). Despite its status as a protected site, the temple has faced criticism for the lack of adequate restoration efforts. Many of the Yogini idols remain damaged, and the site struggles with insufficient maintenance, which risks further deterioration of this invaluable cultural heritage.

Some experts have pointed out that the ASI’s focus on more prominent temples has sidelined lesser-known yet equally significant monuments like Chausath Yogini. The lack of comprehensive restoration and promotion has hindered the temple from gaining the recognition it deserves, both within India and internationally. This neglect not only threatens the temple’s structural integrity but also its cultural and spiritual legacy.

However, the temple has seen renewed interest in recent years, thanks to efforts by local historians, researchers, and heritage enthusiasts. Workshops, guided tours, and awareness campaigns are being organized to highlight the temple’s unique historical and spiritual significance, drawing attention to its need for better preservation and care.

Khair-ul-Manzil, Delhi

The Khair-ul-Manzil, meaning “The Best of Houses,” is a historic mosque and madrasa situated opposite the Purana Qila on Mathura Road in New Delhi, India. Constructed in 1561 by Maham Anga, the influential wet nurse and foster mother of Mughal Emperor Akbar, this monument reflects the architectural styles of the Mughal era.

The mosque’s gateway evidently is built of red stone, showcasing not only Mughal architectural elements but also presence of Hindu motifs and architectures which lies underneath the history.

The interior structure exhibits characteristics of Delhi Sultanate architecture. The huge alleged garbagriha, today known as the prayer hall, has five high- arched openings, and the mosque is constructed primarily of rubble covered with plaster. What lies underneath the plaster is yet to be discovered and only time will speak the evidence of hidden truth.

Upon entering through the old gates, an octagonal shaped water storage is seen, which might not seem very common in mosques. This can raise the question whether something is present beneath the structure which is now mostly being used by few people. 

The masjid is huge in area, and behind it lies a garden, which is closed for the usual public, but some sort of structures can be seen. On both the sides of masjid walks old rugged stone structures which are now broken. This takes the shape of a few chamber-like designs and its significance remains unknown. 

Interestingly, Khair-ul-Manzil also served as a theatre of conflict during the Independence movement. It is believed as per reports that, once British officers discovered that some revolutionaries were hiding in the monument, no sooner cannons were set up and the structure was bombed. Traces of bombing in black marks are still evident in the walls and ceilings of the masjid.

A debate still remains unresolved as there are claims of Khair-ul-Manzil being built on the site of the Hindu temple. As per Sita Ram Goel, a renowned scholar and historian dares to mention in his book “Hindu Temples: What Happened to them” that Khair-ul-Manzil is allegedly built atop of Hindu temple site. Is this fact actually considered the truth? Only further research by archaeologists will break the silence. 

Though there are strong beliefs and evidence that suggest the masjid was constructed on a Hindu Temple as there are presence of certain motifs and architectural elements surrounding the complete structure of the monument.

In summary, while Khair-ul-Manzil stands as a testament to Mughal architecture and the influence of Maham Anga, claims of it being built over a Hindu temple site remain inconclusive without further archaeological evidence. The mosque’s rich history and architectural significance continue to make it a subject of interest for historians and scholars alike.

Bateshwar Temple Complex, Morena

Bateshwar Temples, Morena: A Testament to India’s Enduring Hindu Heritage

Situated amidst the rugged terrain of Morena, Madhya Pradesh, the Bateshwar Group of Temples epitomizes the zenith of India’s ancient Hindu architectural and spiritual traditions. This ensemble of over 200 temples, constructed between the 10th and 14th centuries, offers profound insights into the artistic, cultural, and theological sophistication of medieval India. Far from being mere relics, these temples are enduring symbols of the resilience of Hindu civilization, embodying a sacred continuity that spans millennia.

A Devotional Nexus of Hindu Spirituality

The Bateshwar temples, primarily dedicated to Lord Shiva, Lord Vishnu, and Devi, reflect the centrality of these deities within the pantheon of Hindu dharma. Intricate carvings and sculptures within the complex capture divine narratives with remarkable precision and reverence, underscoring the seamless integration of artistic mastery and devotional intent. Each temple serves as a sanctified space where ritual practice and spiritual inquiry have flourished over centuries, offering a tangible connection to the theological ethos of Sanatana Dharma.

These temples illustrate the profound interplay between faith, culture, and community within Hinduism. As living embodiments of dharma, they highlight the enduring vitality of India’s spiritual traditions, reaffirming the foundational role of religious praxis in shaping societal values and cultural identity.

Architectural Brilliance: The Nagara Style

The Bateshwar temples represent a quintessential expression of Nagara architecture, a prominent style of North Indian temple design. Crafted from locally quarried sandstone, the structures feature a harmonious blend of simplicity and ornamentation. The towering shikharas (spires) ascend with geometric precision, symbolizing an aspirational journey toward the divine, while intricately carved panels depict celestial beings, mythological episodes, and floral motifs.

What distinguishes this temple complex is the meticulous spatial arrangement of individual shrines, creating a unified architectural vision. This coherence is a testament to the sophisticated planning and engineering expertise of its creators. Furthermore, the rich iconographic repertoire—drawing from foundational texts such as the Ramayana, Mahabharata, and Puranas—serves as an invaluable repository of Hindu cultural and philosophical narratives.

A Narrative of Resilience and Revival

The history of Bateshwar is inextricably linked with the tumultuous socio-political landscape of medieval India. The temples, like many others across the subcontinent, bore the brunt of invasions aimed at eroding indigenous cultural expressions. However, the enduring ruins of Bateshwar became a silent testament to the indefatigable spirit of Hindu civilization, resisting erasure and embodying an unbroken legacy.

The modern revival of Bateshwar owes much to the pioneering efforts of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and the dedication of individuals such as archaeologist K.K. Muhammed. Their meticulous restoration work has not only preserved the structural integrity of the temples but also reanimated their cultural and spiritual significance. This initiative underscores the imperative of reclaiming and revitalizing India’s cultural heritage in the face of historical adversities.

According to Michael Meister, the Bateshwar site illustrates the conception and construction of “Mandapika shrine” concept in central India. It is reducing the Hindu temple idea to its basics, in a simple concept that is one step further from the single cave cell design. This design has roots in more ancient Hindu temples found in this region such as one that survives at Mahua and has a Sanskrit inscription that calls the design as sila mandapika (literally, a “stone pandal or pavilion”. This has vedi-platform roots that combines the traditional square plan with various combinations of Hindu temple architecture elements. The temples explore a square sanctum mounted on a basement platform (jagati) that is rectangular, states Meister, so as to incorporate a small praggriva (porch).

These temples have a “simple pillared wall topped by a broad, flat-edged awning which extends beyond the sanctum to shade the entry as well. The square pillars rest directly on the vedibandha, and are crowned by “leaf capitals, their shafts engraved with decorative medallions. At its best this type has a very individual and decorative quality, still like a wooden or ivory box, intervening bands of meandering foliage especially vital, the whole framed by the flat, deeply shadowed vedibandha mouldings and the crisp chadya (with saw-tooth edge) above”, according to Meister. The significance of these temples is that they fuse and experiment with a variety of temple building ideas, such as topping the nagara sikharas that may have been dominant by that time possibly in western India, on the simplest of temple grid plans with more ancient roots in central India.

Many such small shrines are present in the premises of the temple, and inside them are present various types of Shivlings. Different number of mukhi shivlings are present in the temple.

A Vision Anchored in Heritage

The Bateshwar temples illuminate the enduring relevance of India’s dharmic traditions. They stand as a beacon, inspiring a reinvigoration of cultural pride and responsibility. By safeguarding and honoring this legacy, we not only pay homage to the past but also lay a foundation for a future enriched by the timeless values of Sanatana Dharma.

In the magnificence of Bateshwar, we discern the essence of Bharat—a civilization built on resilience, unity, and spiritual profundity. As custodians of this rich inheritance, it is our duty to ensure its preservation and perpetuation for generations to come, thereby sustaining the luminous spirit of Indian heritage.

Recent Developments and Future Directions

Recent restoration efforts have focused on stabilizing and reconstructing the dilapidated structures within the Bateshwar complex. Utilizing traditional techniques and materials, archaeologists have painstakingly revived the intricate carvings and architectural details, ensuring historical authenticity. Advanced conservation strategies, including structural reinforcements and improved drainage systems, have been implemented to safeguard the temples against environmental degradation.

Looking forward, further measures are essential to enhance the preservation and prominence of Bateshwar. These include:

  1. Enhanced Documentation: Comprehensive digital mapping and 3D modeling of the site to create an accessible repository for research and conservation planning.
  2. Community Engagement: Involving local communities in preservation efforts to foster a sense of ownership and pride in their heritage.
  3. Tourism Infrastructure: Developing eco-friendly facilities, including visitor centers, guided tours, and informative exhibits, to promote cultural tourism while protecting the site’s sanctity.
  4. Educational Initiatives: Establishing collaborations with academic institutions for interdisciplinary research and workshops focused on heritage conservation.
  5. Policy Advocacy: Strengthening legal protections against encroachments and ensuring sustained funding for ongoing conservation efforts.

Jama Masjid Sambhal: A Case That Raises Questions Beyond Law

The Jama Masjid in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh, has been at the center of a legal and cultural debate after the Babri Masjid case.

 

 It was hoped that the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid judgment, despite its legal flaws and shoddy reasoning, would put a closure to the mandir-masjid disputes once and for all. Perhaps this hope also led the Supreme Court to allow the Ram Mandir construction, despite finding that there was no conclusive evidence of any pre-existing temple beneath the Babri Masjid and declaring that the installation of idols inside the mosque in 1949 and the destruction of the mosque in 1992 were illegal. Probably, the Court intended this as a “one-time measure” because it categorically stated that historical wrongs by medieval rulers can’t be corrected by the present-day legal regime. More importantly, the 5-judge bench also upheld the Constitutional validity of the Places Of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991(PoW Act) as it was the fulfilment of the State’s “constitutional obligations to uphold the equality of all religions and secularism which is a part of the basic features of the Constitution. The Court observed that the PoW Act reflected the message that “history and its wrongs shall not be used as instruments to oppress the present and the future.” 

The controversy stems from claims that the Jama Masjid mosque, constructed during the Mughal period, was built after demolishing a pre-existing Hindu temple dedicated to Lord Harihar. Such disputes echo larger historical narratives surrounding the construction of religious sites during India’s Mughal era.

On 19th November, a court-mandated survey was conducted at Jama Masjid in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh. The court ordered the survey in response to a petition filed by Supreme Court Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, and seven co-plaintiffs, asserting that the mosque occupies the site of a temple dedicated to Bhagwan Kalki.

Destructuring the petition:

In the petition, it has been asserted that the Jama Masjid in Sambhal was constructed on the centuries-old Shri Hari Har Temple, dedicated to Bhagwan Kalki and destroyed by Babar. The petitioners added that the site holds significant religious importance for Hindus and was forcibly and unlawfully converted into a mosque during the Mughal period. The petitioners further argued that it is a centrally protected monument as per the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act of 1904 and is listed as a monument of national importance by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).       

Some key points from the petition:

-ASI has not done anything to maintain the property and members of the Muslim community have taken advantage and captured the entire property.               

-Some people have formed a Committee known as Intezamia Shahi Jama Masjid Committee and are not NOT allowing any person in public to access the property. Vishnu Jain himself was not allowed to freely enter in August.

-Mosque side is preventing even ASI to control it                                               

– Mosque side has locked a portion of the property without any right to do so.

They further contended that, being devotees of Bhagwan Vishnu and Bhagwan Shiv, they have the right to access the temple for worship and homage. They asserted that the right to worship has been denied by the mosque’s management committee. Furthermore, they also accused the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) of failing to fulfil its statutory duty to ensure public access to the site. They cited Section 18 of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, while seeking access to the site.

The petitioners emphasised that the current situation infringes upon their constitutional right to practise their religion and called for immediate action to restore public access to the site.

Backed up Evidences:

Furthermore, the petition mentioned that during the reign of Akbar, the Ain-i-Akbari was written, which also referred to a prominent temple in Sambhal named Hari Mandir. The text described the temple as being dedicated to Bhagwan Vishnu and the prophesied birthplace of Bhagwan Kalki’s avatar. It further highlighted that the temple held importance during Akbar’s time, suggesting that Hindus had temporarily reclaimed the site before subsequent Mughal interventions.

Ain-i-Akbari read, “There is game in plenty in the Sarkar of Sambel (Sambhal), where the rhinoceros is found.! It is an animal like a small elephant, without a trunk, and having a horn on its snout with which it attacks animals. From its skin, shields are made and from the horn, finger-guards for bow-strings and the like. In the city of Sambal is a temple called Hari Mandal (the temple of Vishnu) belonging to a Brahman, from among whose descendants the tenth avatar will appear in this spot. Hansi is an ancient, the resting-place of Jamal the successor of Shaikh Farid-i-Shakar ganj.“

According to the petition, several archaeological surveys were conducted in Sambhal during 1874–76 by Major-General A. Cunningham, who was the Director General of the ASI. He wrote a report titled “Tours in the Central Doab and Gorakhpur”, which mentioned the architectural elements of the temple that survived the conversion.

Some parts of the book on Sambhal read, “The principal building in Sambhal is the Jami Masjid, which the Hindus claim to have been originally the temple of Hari Mandir. It consists of a central domed room upwards to 20 feet square, with two wings of unequal length, that to the north being 500 feet 6 inches, while the southern wing is only 38 feet 1 1⁄2 inches. Each wing has three arched openings in front, which are all of different widths, varying from 7 feet to 8 feet.”

24 November, 24

Violence erupted in Sambhal after a court-ordered survey at Jama Masjid, as Islamists gathered and started pelting stones at the police. They resorted to arson and clashed with the police present at the scene. The police had to resort to tear gas and baton charge to control the Islamist mob. Several vehicles were set ablaze in the area, and stone pelting continued for hours.

The survey was carried out under the supervision of Advocate Commission. A heavy police force was deployed in the area to ensure the survey proceeded peacefully.

The developments started at around 6:30 AM when a team, including the District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police, arrived at the mosque to conduct the survey. A mob of around 2,000 Muslims gathered outside the mosque and demanded the survey to be stopped.

When the police tried to intervene, the mob started pelting stones, which forced the authorities to retreat briefly. Sources at the site of the incident said that SDM and PRO of SP Sambhal were among the injured as Islamists allegedly attacked the police. Several vehicles belonging to Sambhal police were set ablaze by the Islamist mob. Furthermore, the sources said that Islamists from nearby areas also reached Jama Masjid and joined the mob.

During the survey, however, Muslims living in the area gathered outside the Jama Masjid and raised religious slogans. The District Magistrate of Sambhal confirmed that the survey was completed in around two hours and stated that a report would be submitted to the Civil Court, which will review it on the next date of hearing, 29th November 2024.

Meanwhile, All India Muslim Jamaat Chief Shahbuddin Razvi Barelvi appealed to the minority community in Sambhal to maintain peace and tranquillity, and not to indulge in vandalism and stop stone pelting.

Kakanmath Temple, Morena

Kakanmath Temple, Morena

Kakanmaṭh is a ruined 11th century Shiva temple located at Sihoniya in Madhya Pradesh, India. It was built by the Kachchhapaghata ruler Kirttiraja during 1015 – 1035 AD. Only a part of the original temple complex now survives. Some of the sculptures from the site are now located at Gwalior.

The temple is located in the interior of a small village called Sihoniya, which is approximately 65 north of Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh. The presence of this temple influences the surrounding and the village because of it being a popular place to visit. When one holds the eye on the structure, they may fail to believe that so many stone slabs together piled up forming this mighty structure.

Upon entering the temple on the right side at a raised area there lies this structure which is surrounded by many subparts, which are broken. The pieces are scattered all over the raised land, and it also becomes difficult to reach it. As the terrain is not plain and there lies big holes and stone slabs kept in an unjust manner.

There is a shivling present near the structure. The base is partially broken as seen in the image below. It is on a raised platform with some stone slabs kept on top of each other. 

There are hundreds of small stone slabs, all broken and destroyed. These are just kept piled up on top of each other, the visuals below are from the surrounding of the above garbhagriha.

The tall structure stands still, a true marvellous creation seen upon looking closer it feels that the structure might fall down anytime. At the back side of the main temple there are few rods and support are seen which makes the structure stable from the back side.

These corridors, finely structured with necessary gaps, are quite a piece of architecture. The open sky on top of the temple and these pillars represent beauty. The entire structure is relying on the placements of the stone, and there are no additional cements or any other material used.

Upon climbing the stairs this view opens up to the eyes of the viewers, one might feel inferior in front of these mighty pillars. The dark opening which can be seen below is the main shrine of the temple.

 

This is the center of the pathway to the main shrine and there is a wide opening which is open to the sky. The pillars and stone slabs just balanced on the geometry basis are indeed very captivating and become hard to believe when seen. 

The entrance to the main shrine is on an elevated platform.

The outer portion of the main shrine is engraved with such beautiful stone architecture and portrays the level of architecture that existed back in time, though most of them were broken during invasions but as the time has also passed there condition still remains worth setting as examples. The details and the finishes are astonishing.

There is a single shivling in the main Garbhagriha of the temple, it also consists of the snake around the ling’s neck.

A complete circle around the main garbhagriha consists of these marvel sculptures which are present throughout.

Behind the main garbhagriha there are few rods and supports which are helping the structure to stand and these are just kept in support of some slabs lying there on the floor.


The beautiful sculptures surround the temple and every detail becomes a must see for the visitors. With such precision and absolute skill the artisans might have carved it but it has been mercilessly destroyed during the invasions.


There is a void at a raised section in one of the walls, and it would be possible that there was another marvel sculpture which might have been broken or looted.


The structure of the temple standing at 115 feet and evidently seen as heavily decorated represents nothing but the great Indian Architecture and the quality carvings done.


The mighty pillars surely are a majestic and marvellous creation, by looking at these pictures it is clearly understood the amount of labour and funds it would have taken to create this.

These pictures represent the walls of the outer side of the monument and every bit of it is covered with sculptures and carvings like these, take a moment to please your eyes with these awe spiring visuals. 

We must not forget that the temple is still lying in ruins and needs necessary adjustments and renovation to be done for the safety of the visitors. The stone slabs are just adjusted with the help of basic balance and geometry and there is no fixed cement or liquid which holds it up.

Most of the structures are in pieces and when looking it can be understood there are so many unidentified pieces which need to be kept in their proper place.

There is a mighty gate present approx. to 30m distance from the main stairs of the big structure.

The temple is listed under ASI, there is a pandit and a caretaker who takes care of the temple premises, and there is just ordinary ritual conducted by the pandit.

At the entrance there is an empty space for parking, the road to the temple is not maintained and everyday there are local visitors seen in the premises of the temple. Astonishing fact is that overall the structure of the temple looks like it could fall anytime even with slightest of breeze but is evidently standing strong and it surely needs some renovation for the safety of the visitors and the deity. Th sculptures are not arranged properly and these need to be kept in order.

There are hundreds of unidentified broken slaps and sculptures surrounded in the main premises of the temple.

There is a well which is quite deep in the premises as well as an office which is mostly closed.

The condition of the temple is just at the edge of being somehow existing but it surely needs some genuine fixations along with the presence of strong administration.