Changes in the Indian Architecture : From Sultanate to the Mughals

By Poorvaa Malhotra

Introduction

Architecture has long served as a vital tangible source for understanding the historical development of any civilization. Indian architecture has never developed in isolation; in fact, it is a reflection of syncretism through its cultural interactions, evolving technological capabilities, changing political scenarios, and shifting faiths. It helps archaeologists, historians, and scholars trace the factors of the time this monumental work was commissioned. These include: evolution of engineering techniques, craftsmanship, economic prosperity, resource availability, religious affiliation, cultural landscape, local traditions, and political background.

Long before the first mosque rose on Indian soil, the subcontinent had already produced sophisticated traditions of secular town planning and monumental religious structures. During the medieval period, a shift in architectural styles occurred that reshaped the visual landscape of India following the advent of Islam from the 7th century onwards. This gave rise to Indo-Islamic architecture, becoming one of the most influential styles, blending Persian, Turkish, and indigenous Indian elements. The distinctive engineering and aesthetics of Islamic architecture emphasize harmony, balance, and beauty. The elements, including bulbous domes, arches, colonnaded corridors, gardens, fountains, geometric patterns, and calligraphic decorations, collectively reflect the exquisite craftsmanship that has stood the test of time.

To understand this, a series of articles explores the architecture introduced during the Sultanate and Mughal periods, tracing changes across different dynasties and the political, socio-economic, religious, and cultural factors that shaped the architectural style of each period. This article serves as a foundational guide aiming to familiarize readers with essential architectural terms and typologies, along with a basic historical background of the origin and development of medieval Indian architecture.

Since Ancient times, there has been a rich and diverse architectural tradition in India reflecting the subcontinent’s socio-religious fabric associated primarily with Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. The early Indian architecture was built on the post-and-lintel (trabeate) system, in which weight is carried on vertical posts and spanned by horizontal beams (Harle, 1994).

The earliest evidence of marvellous engineering is found in the Indus Valley Civilization, particularly advanced town planning based on a grid system, wide streets, drainage systems, granaries, and brick houses. The famous Great Bath, a watertight, brick-lined tank on the citadel mound, is a specimen of both architectural brilliance and ritual significance. Excavations by R. D. Banerjee reveal a Stupa mound from the 2nd century CE at Mohenjo-daro indicate a shift towards religious architecture. (Banerji 1984)

Figure 1 The Buddhist Stupa (circa 200 A.D.), Mohenjo-daro Source: Harappa.com

Between the decline of the Indus cities and the rise of Mauryan stone architecture lies a long period for which structural evidence is almost entirely textual and epigraphic. Vedic and early Buddhist textual sources refer to shrines and halls without these structures surviving in physical form, since they were built of wood, bamboo, and sun-dried brick. The Shatapatha Brahmana describes a temple with two-pillared mandapas roofed in thatch; the Sankhayana Srauta Sutra refers to a high-walled structure called a prasada used by priests for making oblations; and the Sanskrit epics repeatedly mention the devayatana, or “abode of the gods”, though without describing its form in any detail (Singh, 2008).

During the 3rd century BCE, the emergence of monumental architecture, including brick and stone stupas, and rock-cut caves, represents a significant development in early religious architectural traditions, including Buddhism and Jainism. The earliest rock-cut caves associated with the Mauryan period were excavated at sites like Barabar and Nagarjuni hills, which were built for meditation and religious practices. The Ellora caves in Aurangabad, Maharashtra, have 32 caves belonging to Buddhism, Jainism, and Brahmanism. Udaigiri-Khandagiri caves near Bhubaneswar, built for Jain Monks, are an important historical site and hold the famous inscriptions of Kharvela. The Lomas Rishi cave is exceptional for its carved facade, which imitates timber construction in stone. This facade is the earliest known example of the chaitya-arch form that would become a standard feature of later Buddhist rock-cut architecture across the Deccan.

The stupas were the core sacred structures serving as reliquary mounds.  According to the Mahaparinibbana Sutta, the Buddha’s relics were originally divided among eight stupas, which were later redistributed among many stupas by  Ashoka, including Sanchi, Piprahwa, Vaishali, Bharhut, Taxila (the Dharmarajika stupa), and Sarnath (Singh, 2008; Mitra, 1971). The stupa is generally a hemispherical dome shaped structure called anda symbolising the burial mound with a square railing called a harmika and a triple-tiered umbrella (chhatra) on top. A medhi is a raised circular platform on which the stupa rests and is surrounded by a circumambulatory path (pradakshina path) for devotees to walk around the stupa in a clockwise direction.  The stupas have elaborately carved toranas, as seen at Sanchi and Bharhut in four cardinal directions. These structures functioned as centres of worship and pilgrimage.

Figure 2 Stupa Source: https://www.artofit.org/  /

During the second and first centuries BCE, there was the construction of the chaityas (prayer halls) and viharas (monastic residences), such as those at Ajanta, Ellora, and Karle. The earliest viharas at Ajanta (Caves 12 and 13) belong to this Hinayana phase, alongside the chaitya hall (Cave 9) and a later vihara (Cave 8) (Singh, 2008). The rock-cut chaitya hall at Karle, with its tall, finely polished interior and elaborately carved facade, is generally regarded as the finest single example of the type from this period (Brown, 1956). The term Vihara, derived from the Sanskrit root vihṛ meaning “to dwell” or “to wander,” is a monastery for Buddhist monks. It generally consists of a verandah or porch, often decorated with pillars and sculptural motifs, along with a central hall and small rock-cut chambers for monks. Viharas received patronage from rulers, guilds, and wealthy donors, especially during the time of the Satavahana dynasty, and were often located near major trade routes to support traveling monks and merchants. During the Gupta and Pala periods, there were Mahaviharas that served as centers for Buddhist learning, including Nalanda, Vikramashila, and Somapura. Rock-cut excavation continued and reached its artistic peak in this period at Ajanta, under the patronage of the Vakataka dynasty, feudatories and contemporaries of the Guptas in the Deccan.

Between the 4th and 6th centuries CE, the Gupta period witnessed the construction of some of the earliest surviving structural temples. They were characterized by flat roofs, the absence of a shikhara, and stood on the raised platforms such as those in Tigawa Temple and Bhumara Temple in Madhya Pradesh , and at Aihole in the Deccan (the so-called Lad Khan temple, c. 450 CE). The pillars were decorated moderately with motifs such as lotuses, kalasha (pot), and back-to-back animal figures. Their door-frames (dvara) are frequently carved with ornamental bands (sakha), depictions of mithuna (amorous couples) (Brown, 1956).

Figure 3 Structure of early Gupta temples Source: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/salient-features-of-late-gupta-temple-architecture/240622876

In the post-Gupta period, well-defined temple architectural styles began to emerge across different parts of India based on geography and regional and historical diversities. The Dashavatara Temple at Deogarh is the finest example to understand the architectural advancements, including the development of shikhara, higher platforms, elaborately carved doorjambs, and increased sculptural decoration on temple walls. The contributions of dynasties such as the Chalukya dynasty, Pallava dynasty, Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty, and Rashtrakuta dynasty further show the development of diverse regions within these broader architectural styles.

The Nagara Style: It developed in northern India between the Himalayas and the Vindhyas. The Nagara style is marked with an open structure where the temple is constructed on a highly raised platformed with steps (sopana) leading to the entrance. The characteristic feature of these temples is the curvilinear superstructure known as the shikhara, rising directly above the garbhagriha (sanctum) and is crowned by an amalaka and a kalasha (finial). The basic plan typically includes the garbhagriha, antarala (vestibule), and one or more mandapas. Upon entering the temple, there are images of Goddess Ganga and Yamuna carved on either side of the doorway symbolising spiritual cleansing before stepping into the temple. The temple walls, doors, pillars, and shikhara are adorned with the carving of gods and goddesses, celestial beings, and mithuna, gandharvas, yakshinis, as exemplified in the temples of Khajurao.

Within this broad family, regional schools emerged: the Kalinga (Odisha) school, comprising the deul (sanctum tower), jagamohana (audience hall), nata-mandira (dance hall), and bhoga-mandapa, as shown by the Parashurameshvara temple (7th century), Mukteshvara temple (10th century), and Lingaraja temple (11th century) at Bhubaneswar. Based on the type of deul, it can be classified as rekha deul (sanctum tower), pidha deul (stepped pyramidal mandapa), and khakhara deul (rectangular structures with wagon-vaulted roofs). The Chandela school at Khajuraho in Madhya Pradesh  includes temples with beautifully carved sculptures such as Vishnu Temple at Chaturbhuj, Madhya Pradesh, Shiva Temple at Visvanath, and Kendriya Mahadev Temple, Madhya Pradesh. The Solanki school shows a dome-shaped ceiling with delicate carvings  as seen in the Shiva Temple at Visvanath, and the Kendriya Mahadev Temple, Madhya Pradesh.

Figure 4 Nagara Style of temple architecture Source: WordPress.com

The Dravidian style: This style of temple architecture flourished in southern India, particularly under the Pallavas, Cholas, and Vijayanagara rulers. It has a pyramidal vimana rising in stepped tiers above the garbhagriha. Temples are enclosed within high compound walls, with grand gopurams (gateway towers). The garbhagriha is square in plan and connected to the mandapa through an antarala. Extensive sculptural decoration of deities, mythological narratives, and guardian figures such as dvarapalas positioned at entrances. The Shore Temple at Mahabalipuram (7th century) of the Pallavas is a significant example of the monolithic Ratha and cave temples, while the Cholas advanced temple construction, particularly during the reign of Rajaraja Chola, when the Brihadeeswarar Temple in Thanjavur. The later Vitthala temple at Hampi, associated with the Vijayanagara empire, is particularly noted for its acoustic “musical” pillars (Michell, 1988)

Figure 5 Dravida Style of Architecture Source: www.tamilnadutourism.tn.gov.in

The Vesara Style: The Vesara style is a fusion of elements of the Nagara and Dravidian architectural traditions, emerging prominently in the Deccan region during the rule of the Chalukyas and later refined by the Rashtrakutas and Hoysalas. Generally having a star-shaped plan, there are mandapas, mukha-mandapas, and garbhagrihas with carved pillars and ceilings. Decorative elements such as pilasters, cornices, chhajjas (projecting eaves), and soapstone carvings enhanced its grandeur and were commonly seen in the temples built during the Chalukya dynasty, particularly at Aihole, Badami, and Pattadakal.

By the end of the first millennium CE, India had developed a highly sophisticated and diverse architectural tradition. From the 11th century onward, Indian architecture entered a new medieval phase marked by both the continued evolution of regional Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain traditions and the arrival of Islamic architectural influences through the establishment of Turkic and later Sultanate rule in northern India.

Before the advent of Islamic rule, India was renowned for its temples, which featured reliefs of gods and goddesses, rock-cut caves, Buddhist and Jain Stupas, Caityas, and Viharas. With the arrival of Islamic rulers, Indian architecture underwent a continuous process of adaptation and synthesis shaped by cultural values, political transitions, religious influences, and the exchange of artistic expressions. The beginning of the Sultanate Period in India, around the 12th century CE, marked the first monumental work, which is characterized by Persian and Indian elements. The Quwwat-ul-Islam MosquebyQutbuddin Aibak is a foundational example of the Indo-Islamic style, which was built by reusing the materials of demolished temples. The Sultanate architecture gradually developed with distinctive styles during the rule of successive dynasties, including Tughlaq, Lodi, Khalji, and Sayyid.

The Khalji Dynasty (1290–1320 CE) under Alauddin Khalji built the Alai Darwaza (1311 CE), constructed true arch and dome. The tombs and citadels of the Tughlaq Dynasty (1320–1414 CE) at Delhi (Tughlaqabad, Firuzabad) were sturdy and practical in structure with minimal decoration, as the Turks were still in the process of settling down. The rulers were threatened by the Mongols, who made sudden invasions from the north. This is why the buildings of this period are strong, sturdy, and practical. During the Afghan rule, the tombs of Ibrahim Lodi at Delhi and Shershah’s tomb at Sasaram were built. The architecture of this period also shows how indigenous styles were adopted and utilised by the builders. They introduced the octagonal tomb plan, the double dome raised on a drum, and gardens around the mausoleum.

Furthermore, the provincial dynasties of Gujrat, Malwa, Jaunpur, Bengal, Sindh, Kashmir, and the Deccan Sultanate have varying styles that reflected regional diversity. For instance, the Bengal style used brick and mortar with black marble accents and curved “Bangla roofs,” which suited the local climate, whereas the Jaunpur (Sharqi) style had arch-and-beam construction and had Tughlaq influence, which was noted by John Marshall (The Cambridge History of India, vol. III)

The Mughals initiated aggrandization of architecture through monumental scale, bulbous or double domes, use of refined proportions and elements, including Jali screens, Parchin Kari (Pietra dura) inlay, calligraphic styles, extensive floral and vine motifs, and high-quality red sandstone and white marble. They introduced the concept of Gardens (Charbagh) and water fountains, which embody philosophical and aesthetic values that were symbolic of the Quranic idea of paradise. Babur introduced the charbagh (four-part garden) to South Asia and built the first Mughal garden, Aram Bagh, at Agra.

Apart from palaces and mosques, the medieval period also witnessed the construction of functional water structures such as tanks, step wells (baʾoli), and reservoirs (talab), highlighting the broader scope of architectural developments during the Sultanate and Mughal periods.

Humayun’s tomb at Delhi (completed c. 1570 CE), built by his widow Haji Begum and attributed to the Persian architect Mirak Mirza Ghiyas, shows a double dome, a hasht bihisht (eight-paradise) plan, and a formal Charbagh. Later, during the reign of Akbar, the architecture was built on a huge scale: Agra Fort (1565–1573 CE), and the entirely planned capital of Fatehpur Sikri (1571–1585 CE), where Persian, Indian, and local Gujarati expressions were synthesised. The famous Taj Mahal and Red Fort by Shah Jahan and major Mughal mosques, including the Badshahi Mosque at Lahore by Aurangzeb, contributed to the later decline of the Mughal architectural tradition.

Unlike Hindu architecture, which incorporates sculptures, deities and relief motifs as decoration, Islamic architecture emphasises the non-religious elements, including geometrical patterns, calligraphic inscriptions, and unique architectural features. They replaced the trabeate post-and-lintel method with the arcuate system, in which the weight of the roof is supported by arches, making it possible to build larger and taller structures. These features were not merely a matter of style but had an underlying philosophical concept that enhances their elegance. Listed below are several key architectural elements:

1. Domes

Domes are circular vaulted roofing structures that form one of the most distinctive features of Islamic and Indo-Islamic architecture. The first domes were seen in the Middle East and North Africa due to the scarcity of timber; hence, domes, being large hollow roofs, required no intermediate supports. The idea of domes in India is derived from pre-Islamic Hindu, Buddhist and Jain architectural structures, including stupas, round huts, and Shikharas of temples. Initially, the domes were built using mud brick and corbelling techniques due to the absence of true arches. The domes raised on a square or rectangular base without drum, squinches, or pendentives were known as domical vaults, often seen in early Indo-Islamic architecture. Over time, diverse dome typologies emerged, including double domes, muqarnas or conical domes, bulbous Mughal domes, and glazed tile domes of Iran and Central Asia.

The Alai Darwaza, the southern gateway of the Qutb complex in Delhi built by Alauddin Khilji in 1311 employ true dome and arch, although its thick walls and shallow dome profile still show a transitional engineering approach. From the Tughlaq period onward, the dome was increasingly raised on a supporting drum, which improved both its stability and its visual presence, and later Mughal builders extended the principle further still with the double dome.

Figure 6 Dome Architecture in India; Source: fotisedu.com

2. Arches

Arches are a fundamental part of Islamic architecture, which is a structure between walls, columns, or piers. Derived initially from Roman and Byzantine precedents, the semi-circular arch was soon accompanied by various forms such as the pointed arch, horseshoe arch, four-centred arch, and cusped arch. These arch forms were to add a decorative expression in the architecture. In mosques, arches are mostly used in arcades with courtyards and in prayer halls. In the Indian context, arches were introduced by Muslim rulers and initially built as corbelled forms, gradually evolving into true arches as construction techniques advanced. The Tomb of Sultan Balban at Mehrauli, built around 1287–88, is credited with containing the first true arch raised in India.

Figure 7 Forms of Arches by Percy Brown, 1968

3. Squinch

A squinch is a foundational component of a dome. It is a small architectural arch or niche placed diagonally across the corners of a square structure to facilitate the transition to an octagonal or circular base for a dome. Largely used in pre-Ottoman Islamic architecture, squinches were introduced as an early solution for dome construction. This technique was widely employed in West and Central Asia and later adapted in Indo-Islamic architecture, particularly in early Sultanate monuments. Symbolically, squinches help give height to the dome so it rises upward, and can therefore signify the upliftment of human consciousness towards the divine.

Figure 8 Squinch; Source: heritagearchitecturestyle.blogspot.com

4. Geometric and Floral Patterns

In contrast to figurative representation in the Hindu architecture, Muslims chose to focus on abstraction and aesthetics through geometric and floral patterns. These patterns are based on symmetrical principles involving circles, squares, stars, and polygons, symbolising cosmic order and the unity of God (tawhid). Foliation in the form of stylised plants such as martagon, Lily, crown imperial, and tulips added fluidity in the architecture. They use arabesques (tauriq), which are continuous interwoven vegetal patterns that adds an element of nature, growth and unity. In Indo-Islamic architecture, such patterns were extensively used on façades, domes, spandrels, and interior surfaces. Mughals are also credited for introducing the technique of Pietra dura (Prachin Kari), which means “hard stone” in Italian, an art form that uses inlay of semi-precious stone—lapis lazuli, jasper, carnelian, onyx, and similar materials into marble or any other hard surfaces to create patterns. This was extensively used during the reign of Shah Jahan, particularly in the construction of the Taj Mahal.

Figure 9 Pietra dura work at Agra; Source: blogspot.com

5. Calligraphic Inscriptions

Calligraphy, which refers to the art of stylised writing, was an integral part of Islamic architectural tradition. The calligraphic inscriptions not only give historical or religious information but were a medium of architectural decoration. Most often, these are verses from the Qur’an along with the Kalima and names of Allah. They are written in Arabic or Persian scripts using styles such as Kufic, Naskh, Thuluth, and Nastaʿliq, based on specific historical periods and regional preferences. The inscriptions on the entrance gate of the Taj Mahal, designed by the calligrapher Amanat Khan, are among the finest examples of architectural calligraphy in the world.

Figure 10 Calligraphic Panel at Buland Darwaza; Source: Indiaa2z.com

6. Tilework

Tilework is used for surface decoration where glazed tiles are shaped in different designs and patterns, including single tiles, composite panels, and mosaics. Techniques such as monochrome glazing, lustre painting, cuerda seca, and underglaze painting (minai) were used to decorate tiles in Islamic architecture. Regional tile traditions developed in India often include mosaics and mirror work

Figure 11 Tilework (mosaic) at Agra Fort; Source:dreamstime.com

7. Stucco Decoration

Stucco is a technique which uses plaster to create decorative styles, particularly in regions lacking suitable stone. It is derived from the German word ‘Stucchi’, meaning crust or coating (Sengupta 1981). Originating in Iran, stucco decoration flourished under Islamic patronage and spread across the Middle East, North Africa, and India. It was employed to cover walls and ceilings with carved geometric, vegetal, and epigraphic designs.

8. Spatial Principles

Spatial arrangement in Indo-Islamic architecture is seen in the symmetry, proportion, and balance. They had a strong understanding of light, shadow, water, and enclosed spaces, making them functional and allowing an atmosphere of tranquillity. One of the widely seen is the Hasht Bihisht planning which is a formally symmetrical layout in which a central domed chamber is surrounded by eight subsidiary rooms, the ‘eight paradises’ of the name, installed at Humayun’s Tomb and at the Taj Mahal.

Islamic architecture can be classified into Religious (sacred) and secular structures. It includes the following:

1. Mosques (Masjid)

Mosques are the most noteworthy religious structures in Islamic architecture that function as places of congregation and worship. The term masjid literally means a place of prostration. Mescit is used for a small mosque without a minbar in Turkish. A Jami‘ Masjid (congregational mosque) typically includes an open courtyard (sahn) surrounded by arcades, a water tank or fountain (hauz) for ritual ablution (wazu), and a prayer hall indicating direction of Mecca. The qibla wall, which faces Mecca, is the sacred side of the mosque and contains the mihrab, a semi-circular niche that indicates the direction of prayer. The prayer chamber is within the qibla side, and devotees can enter through pointed arches, often surmounted by domes and vaults. Idgah / Musalla / Namazgah refers to open-air prayer spaces, usually located outside city boundaries and used during festivals such as Eid. Decoration can be seen in calligraphy, geometric, and vegetal motifs, as figurative representation is prohibited in Islamic religious contexts. Also, there are sanctuaries and halls: Zulla (Arabic term), which refers to a shaded or covered area, while ziyada is an outer extension of the mosque. Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque, Delhi (begun c. 1193 CE) was the first mosque built in India after the Ghurid conquest, constructed under Qutb al-Din Aibak by reusing columns and architectural members from demolished temples. The mosque’s screen of pointed arches is corbelled (not true-arched) and shows Indian craftsmen adapting their post-and-lintel skill to Islamic forms they had never built beforeAdhai Din Ka Jhonpra, Ajmer (c. 1192–1199 CE): Built on the site of a Sanskrit college, this mosque preserves remarkable corbelled arch screens decorated with a dense programme of calligraphy. Its seven-arch screen facade is among the earliest large-scale examples of the Indo-Islamic aesthetic. During the 16th century, the construction of largest mosques Jama Masjid, Fatehpur Sikri was  built in red sandstone by Akbar, it features a vast courtyard, multiple domed bays, and the monumental Buland Darwaza which was added in 1601–1602 CE to commemorate Akbar’s Gujarat campaign.

Figure 12 Plan of Masjid; Source: kefa108.pdf

2. Tombs and Mausoleums

Tombs (Qabr) and monumental mausoleums (rauza, dargah) are part of Islamic funerary architecture. In medieval India, tombs of rulers, nobles, and saints became prominent expressions of power and faith. Notable examples include the tombs of Humayun, Akbar, Itmad-ud-Daula, and the Taj Mahal. The graves are often engraved with inscribed cenotaphs (qabr, taʾwidh). According to Anthony Welch, tomb architecture conveyed both spiritual ideals of eternal paradise and the worldly authority of the ruler. There are various terms used according to the purpose:

  • Hazira: A tomb within an enclosure, often accompanied by a mosque.
  • Maqbara and Mazar: These are Arabic terms that refer to a mausoleum or shrine
  • Qabrstan: Grave or cemetery
  • Ziyarat: Venerated shrine or mausoleum
  • Khanqah: A monastery or hostel for Sufis or dervishes

Figure 13 Humayun Tomb source: Weebly

For instance, Tomb of Iltutmish, Delhi (c. 1235 CE) is a simple square chamber, its interior walls adorned with calligraphy and geometric stone carving. Built on an octagonal platform rising from a large artificial lake, Tomb of Shershah Suri, Sasaram, Bihar is a Mughal garden-tomb planning on a remarkable scale. Subsequently, the tomb architecture advanced as seen in Tomb of Itmad-ud-Daula, Agra which was built by Nur Jahan for her father Mirza Ghiyas Beg, entirely in white marble.

3. Secular Architecture

3.1 Palaces and Forts (Qasr, Qalʿa, Hisar)

Palaces and forts were the royal residential places. The fortification walls also serve as defensive boundaries to protect the territory, subjects and resources. A vast fortified city built by Ghiyas-ud-Din Tughlaq at Tughlaqabad Fort, Delhi is made of massive rubble masonry and battered walls. The Mughals constructed some of the most magnificent forts in the Indian subcontinent. Among these, Agra Fort, rebuilt by Emperor Akbar between 1565 and 1573 CE, is situated on the banks of the Yamuna River, this massive red sandstone fortress encloses audience halls, mosques, and gardens. The palaces also include buildings like the Diwan-i-Aam (public audience hall), followed by private quarters containing the Diwan-i-Khas, bathhouses, pools, courtyards, and the zenana. The example of planned capital is seen in  Fatehpur Sikri, built with red sandstone by Emperor Akbar.

3.2 Hammams (Bathhouses)

Hammams were a unique feature of Islamic palaces, derived from Byzantine bath traditions. They were typically public or private bathhouses which included heated rooms using hypocaust systems, domed roofs, and controlled lighting through glass roundels. Notable early examples include Qusayr Amra and Khirbet al-Mafjar. In Islamic culture, hammams functioned as spaces for both religious practices and public use. In India, there are examples of hammams, including Ḥammām at the Qutb Shahi Heritage Park, Hyderabad; Hammam-e-Lal Qila, Red Fort; and Hammam at Ram Bagh.

Figure 14 Drawing hammam chamber, by Ghulam Ali Khan (19th century); Source: Wikipedia

3.3 Zanana

The Zanana, or Zenana, roots in Persian “zenān” that means “women”, were the women’s quarters in a palace or house. It is also known as Harem in Middle Eastern countries. It has courtyards and gardens for the women to enjoy luxury and recreation. Notable examples survive at the Qutb Shahi Heritage Park in Hyderabad and at the Red Fort in Delhi.

Figure 15 Women in Zenana, 17th century; Source: newarab.com

3.4 Caravanserais and Sarais

Caravanserais (khans or sarais) were roadside inns or guest houses that provided shelter for travellers, traders, nobles, and pilgrims. They were built on rectangular or square plans and functioned not only as a resting place, but also facilitated trade activities, cross-cultural interaction and administrative control across the subcontinent. Several travel accounts record the details and experiences of travellers, for instance, Bernier mentions his visit to Sarai, built by Jahan Ara in Delhi, giving his description of a pleasant experience.

3.5 Madrasas

Madrasas, often situated near mosques, were the centres of Islamic learning, Urdu and Sufi knowledge. Originating in Seljuk Iran during the eleventh century, madrasa architecture evolved into both open- and closed-courtyard types, often organised around four iwans, each associated with a school of Islamic law. The madrasa at Hauz Khas (built under Feroz Shah Tughlaq, r. 1351–1388 CE) and the Madrasa of Mahmud Gawan at Bidar (1472 CE) are notable examples.

Figure 16 madrasa Jamia Hussain by Queen Rajye Bibi; Source: jamiahusainia.in

4. Architectural Structures

4.1 Muqarnas

Muqarnas, also called stalactite or honeycombs, were projecting niches usually used in domes, doorways, and niches to give structural transitions and ornamentation. Originating in the ninth to tenth centuries, muqarnas became one of the most distinctive elements of Islamic architecture.

4.2 Mihrab

The mihrab is a niche that indicates the direction of prayer towards Mecca. It is a part of the qibla wall of a mosque. It became an important structure in Islamic architecture, incorporating calligraphy, geometric patterns, stucco, tilework, and marble inlay. The mihrab was not only an architectural feature but was also depicted on coins, such as those issued under Akbar, which were called Mehrabi coins, reflecting religious legitimacy.

Figure 17 Mehrabi coin by Akbar; Source: altuniye.in

4.3 Minbar

On the right side of the mihrab lies the minbar, which is a raised pulpit reached by steps from which sermons (khutbah) are delivered by the Imam. Said to have originated in the time of the Prophet Muhammad (629 CE), it became a symbol of political and religious authority. Minbars are commonly made of wood or stone and may include carved decoration, domes, or canopies. It generally has two steps and a seat (makad).

Figure 18 Minar, Jama Masjid, Delhi; Source: flickr

4.4 Minaret (Maadhana)

The minaret is a tower generally associated with mosques and used for the call to prayer (azaan). Introduced during the Abbasid period, minarets also symbolised political power and religious authority. In India, minarets were not adopted widely, but notable examples include the Qutub Minar in Delhi and the Chand Minar at Daulatabad, both reflecting a synthesis of local and Persian influences. These are built of buff red sandstone and often include geometrical patterns and calligraphic bands. R. Nath mentions in his book, Glories of Medieval Indian Architecture, that Minars were adopted from the idea of the Hindu Kirtistambha or Dhavajastambha. Mughal builders later paired minarets with the pishtaq, a tall rectangular frame set around a vaulted iwan (a recessed hall open on one side) and typically decorated with calligraphy and geometric ornament, a form drawn from Timurid and Safavid practice in Samarkand and Iran.

The architecture of India’s Sultanate and Mughal periods reflects a blend of Central Asian, Persian, and Indian influences. Hence, Indo-Islamic architecture was not a replacement but it entered into a dialogue the Indian architectural culture, borrowing craftsmanship and materials and laid the foundation of the structure based on adaptation, negotiation, and cultural fusion.

 

Bibliography

Brown, P. (1959). Indian architecture: (Buddhist and Hindu periods).

Brown, P. (1968). Indian Architecture (Islaamic Period). Taraporevala’s Treasure House of Books.

Burton-Page, J. (2008). Indian Islamic architecture : forms and typologies, sites and monuments.

Chaturvedi, R. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Sultanate and Mughal Architecture. 9(9). doi:10.5281/zenodo.14584839

Dar, A. A., & Ganie2, Z. R. (2019). Growth and development of Indo Islamic architecture of India from early thirteenth century to A.D to fifteenth century A.D under Delhi Sultans. Research Journal of Language, Literature and Humanities _, 62.

Fergusson, J. (1899). History of Indian and eastern Architecture vol.1.

Giridhar, D. N. (20199). Architectural Development under the Mughal Period. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 6(9).

Hussain, J., & Singh, D. P. (2025). Mughal Architecture: Symbol Of Power And Culture. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CREATIVE RESEARCH THOUGHTS, 13(5).

Kaur, K. P. (2015). Intermingling of Societies: Revisiting Delhi Sultanate . Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 3, 370-380.

Koch, E. (1991). Mughal Architecture.

Petersen, A. (1996). Dictionary of Islamic Architecture.

Humayun Tomb

Humayun’s Tomb: A Mughal Marvel

 

Humayun’s Tomb, located in Delhi, is an architectural masterpiece and a precursor to the Taj Mahal. Built between 1565 and 1572 CE by Empress Bega Begum, it is the first grand Mughal mausoleum in India and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. This monument serves as the final resting place of Emperor Humayun. But do the architectural features cast doubt on the temple’s architectural influences?

humayun's tomb

Historical Background

Humayun, the second ruler of the Mughal dynasty, faced a turbulent reign marked by defeat, exile, and eventual return. After losing his empire to Sher Shah Suri, he regained the throne but died unexpectedly in 1556 CE. His widow, Bega Begum (Haji Begum), undertook the responsibility of building a magnificent tomb in his honor. She personally supervised the construction and even travelled to Mecca for Hajj, further emphasizing the tomb’s significance as a spiritual monument.

humayun's tomb

Designed by Persian architect Mirak Mirza Ghiyas, the tomb was constructed on the banks of the Yamuna, some architectural elements reflect Indian (Hindu temple) influences, likely due to the involvement of local craftsmen and artisans.

humayun's tomb

Architectural Features

Humayun’s Tomb was a ground breaking structure in the evolution of Mughal architecture, introducing several elements that later inspired the Taj Mahal. It was the first garden tomb in India, marking a departure from earlier Mughal invasion-era tombs.

humayun's tomb

Key Features:

  • Double-Domed Structure: The massive white dome sits on an octagonal drum, creating a grand visual impact.
    humayun's tomb
  • Charbagh Garden Layout: The tomb is set within a Persian-style Charbagh, a four-part garden layout symbolizing paradise in Islamic tradition.humayun's tomb
  • Red Sandstone and Marble Inlay: The tomb is built using red sandstone with intricate white and black marble inlays, showcasing exquisite craftsmanship.
  • High Arches and Vaulted Entrances: The structure features monumental iwans (arched entrances) on all four sides, a hallmark of Persian and Timurid architecture.humayun's tomb
  • Ornamental Chhatris (Pavilion-Like Domes): Small domed pavilions, typically found in Rajput and Hindu temple architecture, decorate the tomb’s roof.humayun's tomb
  • Jali Screens and Calligraphy: The delicate stone lattice screens (jali work) allow light and air to pass through while adding an aesthetic touch. These screens, though an Islamic feature, bear resemblance to carvings found in earlier Indian temples.humayun's tomb

Hindu Temple Influences incorporated in the Design

While Humayun’s Tomb is fundamentally an Islamic funerary structure, many architectural elements suggest pre-Islamic Indian influences:

humayun's tomb

  1. Raised Platform: The entire structure is elevated on a massive plinth, similar to Hindu temple foundations that signifies sacredness. The massive gateway (pishtaq) echoes Persian designs but is also reminiscent of monumental Hindu temple entrances.
    humayun's tomb
  2. Chhatris (Pavilion-Like Domes): Typically associated with Rajput architecture, these are seen on the tomb’s upper structure commonly seen in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. These were not typically found in Persian tombs but became a signature of Indo influenced architecture.
    humayun's tomb
  3. Red Sandstone Construction: The patterns carved into the red sandstone facades resemble motifs found in Hindu and Jain temples. The extensive use of red sandstone with white marble inlays resembles materials used in early Hindu and Jain temples, such as those in Rajasthan and Gujarat.                        Persian structures mainly favored baked bricks and tiles, but invaded Mughal buildings incorporated indigenous Indian materials.humayun's tomb
  4. Vastu-Based Symmetry: The perfect alignment of the Charbagh gardens and tomb structure follows some Vastu Shastra principles, indicating an influence of Indian architectural traditions.humayun's tomb

While there is no concrete evidence that Humayun’s Tomb was built on a pre-existing Hindu structure, its fusion of Indian and Persian elements reflects highly influential use of great Indian architeural designs, which was populary found all over the state but was later invaded, destroyed and converted over time.

humayun's tomb

Decline and Restoration

Over the centuries, Humayun’s Tomb witnessed periods of neglect and deterioration, particularly during British rule. The once-meticulously maintained Charbagh gardens were replaced by an English-style garden, altering the original Indo-Persian aesthetic.

humayun's tomb

By the 20th century, the tomb had lost much of its grandeur, prompting conservation efforts. Major restoration work began under the supervision of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), with further revitalization undertaken by INTACH and the Aga Khan Trust for Culture in collaboration with UNESCO. These efforts focused on removing later additions, restoring the original Charbagh layout, and reinforcing structural integrity.

humayun's tomb

Today, after conservation, Humayun’s Tomb stands restored, and there lies a possibility, that alterations of ancient elements might have been removed or changed completely and the original influence might not be visible to the current viewers. Though there are no official reports on the same but a possiblity remains in the corner.

humayun's tomb

 

Neela Gumbad (Humayun Tomb Complex)

 

Neela Gumbad, located within the Humayun’s Tomb complex in Delhi, is an architectural marvel from the Mughal invasion era, distinguished by its striking blue-tiled dome. Built in the late 16th or early 17th century, it is believed to be the tomb of a Mughal noble, though historical records do not definitively confirm the identity of the individual buried within. The monument is among the earliest examples of glazed tile decoration in India, and being influenced by the Indian architectural elements.

neela gumbad

Architectural Features of Neela Gumbad

neela gumbad

Dome and Facade

  • The most distinctive feature of Neela Gumbad is its vivid blue-tiled dome, which gives the monument its name. The use of Persian-style glazed tiles was relatively rare in India at the time, making this structure an early example of this technique.
  • The dome sits on a square chamber with an octagonal drum, a form frequently seen in Islamic funerary architecture.
  • The exterior walls are decorated with remnants of geometric and floral tilework, adding to its aesthetic appeal.neela gumbad

Interior Design

  • The interior of Neela Gumbad is relatively plain, with remnants of stucco plasterwork that once adorned its walls.neela gumbad
  • The absence of elaborate calligraphy and Quranic inscriptions, typical of Mughal tombs, suggests a more localized influence in its design.neela gumbad

Hindu Architectural Influences

While Neela Gumbad is predominantly an Islamic funerary monument, there are certain architectural features that hint at pre-Islamic Indian influences:

neela gumbad

  1. Bracketed Eaves (Chhajjas): These overhanging eaves, commonly found in Hindu and Rajput architecture, are present in the structure.
    neela gumbad
  2. Ornamental Carvings: Some of the floral patterns resemble traditional Hindu temple motifs, indicating the involvement of local artisans.neela gumbad
  3. Octagonal Plan Similarity: The eight-sided structure is reminiscent of stepwell and mandapa designs seen in earlier Hindu architecture.neela gumbad

Historical Significance

Neela Gumbad was constructed around the same time as Humayun’s Tomb (mid to late 16th century), making it one of the earliest Mughal-era structures in Delhi. The use of Persian tilework and traditional Indian elements reflects the cultural influence from the land. It remains one of the most visually unique tombs in the Humayun’s Tomb complex.

neela gumbad

Conclusion

Neela Gumbad stands as a testament to the rich architectural diversity of the ancient period, incorporating elements of Persian, Timurid, and Indian craftsmanship. While primarily an Islamic funerary structure, the presence of Hindu-style brackets and floral motifs highlights the blending of artistic traditions in medieval India. Today, Neela Gumbad remains a fascinating yet often overlooked structure, offering insight into the evolution of Indo-Islamic architecture.

neela gumbad

neela gumbad

Kali Gumti, Hauz Khas

Introduction

Kali Gumti, nestled within the serene surroundings of Deer Park in Hauz Khas, Delhi, is a lesser-known yet historically significant monument. This medieval structure is a striking example of Indo-Islamic architecture, reflecting the artistic and cultural advancements of the Delhi Sultanate period. Despite its historical importance, Kali Gumti has suffered from neglect and vandalism, with graffiti and carvings marring its original beauty. This article delves into its history, influenced architectural features, and the modern challenges it faces.

kali gumti

Historical Background

Kali Gumti is believed to have been constructed during the reign of the Lodi or Tughlaq dynasties (14th–15th century), a period known for its impressive architectural innovations. The structure likely served as a tomb or a gateway, contributing to the urban fabric of medieval Delhi. Hauz Khas, meaning “Royal Tank,” was an important hub during the Delhi Sultanate, with several monuments and structures built around the large water reservoir originally commissioned by Alauddin Khalji in the late 13th century.

kali gumti

Over the centuries, the surrounding area of Hauz Khas evolved, with the Tughlaqs and later dynasties adding madrasas, tombs, and pavilions to create a vibrant center of learning and administration. Kali Gumti, though smaller in scale compared to the nearby Hauz Khas monuments, has fated its way into being in an abondoned condition where the visitors have sprayed graffitis and vandalised the ancient structure.

kali gumti

Architectural Features

Kali Gumti exhibits several key elements of Indo-Islamic architecture, including:

  • Simple Design: Unlike grander structures of the period, Kali Gumti is characterized by a minimalist yet elegant design, typical of tombs and smaller pavilions of the time.
  • Pointed Arches: The structure features pointed arches, a hallmark of Islamic architecture, providing both aesthetic appeal and structural stability.
  • Domed Roof: A significant feature of Islamic tomb architecture, the dome of Kali Gumti reflects Persian and Afghan influences.
  • Thick Stone Walls: Built with locally available stone, the monument showcases the durability and craftsmanship of medieval builders.
  • Carved Niches and Minimal Ornamentation: Unlike larger tombs and mosques, Kali Gumti has relatively simple decoration, with a focus on geometric patterns and calligraphy.

kali gumti

Vandalism and Modern-Day Damage

Despite its historical and architectural significance, Kali Gumti has become a victim of neglect and vandalism. Over the years, visitors have defaced the monument by carving their names onto its walls and spray-painting graffiti, diminishing its authenticity. These unsanctioned markings obscure the original craftsmanship and contribute to the degradation of the structure.

kali gumti

Lack of maintenance and awareness about heritage preservation has further worsened the condition of the monument. Encroachment and unchecked visitor activities have resulted in making the monument vulnerable to further deterioration

kali gumti

While the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and local heritage organizations have undertaken some conservation projects in Hauz Khas, structures like Kali Gumti often receive less attention than larger monuments.

kali gumti

Conclusion

Kali Gumti, a quiet yet significant structure in Deer Park, Hauz Khas, is a reminder of Delhi’s medieval past. However, its historical monument is being overshadowed by vandalism and neglect.

kali gumti

 

Kale Khan Ka Gumbad

Kale Khan Ka Gumbad: A Possible Converted Monument

Kale Khan Ka Gumbad, a 16th-century tomb located in Delhi, believed to belong to an individual named Kale Khan, though historical records provide little clarity about his identity. This Lodhi-era structure is an example of early Indo-Islamic architecture, featuring a blend of Persian, Afghan, and Indian influences. Positioned within the historical complex of Nizamuddin, the monument often goes unnoticed despite its architectural significance.

Notably, historian Sita Ram Goel listed Kale Khan Ka Gumbad among monuments that he argued were built over pre-existing Hindu temple sites. Given the historical context of temple demolitions and repurposing of structures during the medieval period, this claim raises important questions. Elements such as the raised plinth, potential reuse of temple materials, and stylistic influences like chhatris (domed pavilions) suggest that the tomb may have incorporated remnants of an earlier Hindu shrine.

kale khan ka gumbad

Architectural Features of Kale Khan Ka Gumbad

The tomb follows the octagonal plan typical of the Lodhi dynasty, topped with a massive hemispherical dome. Constructed primarily of Delhi quartzite and red sandstone, it features arched entrances on all sides, reflecting the characteristic simplicity of Lodhi-era tombs. The structure also includes intricate jali (lattice) work, decorative medallions, and remnants of floral motifs.

kale khan ka gumbad

Key Architectural Elements:

  • Dome and Squared Base: The large dome rests on a raised platform, supported by squinches and pendentives—typical features of early Ancient Indian structures influenced Islamic architecture in India.
  • Pointed Arches and Minimal Ornamentation: Unlike later Mughal tombs, which had elaborate designs, Kale Khan Ka Gumbad maintains a modest aesthetic, focused on structural strength.kale khan ka gumbad
  • Use of Chhajjas and Brackets: These overhanging eaves are reminiscent of earlier Indian temple architecture, hinting at indigenous influences in Islamic structures.

Hindu Architectural Influences

While built as an Islamic tomb, some architectural features of Kale Khan Ka Gumbad reflect pre-Islamic inavasion Indian elements:

kale khan ka gumbad

  1. Corbelled Brackets and Chhajjas: These overhanging eaves resemble traditional Hindu and Rajput architectural features found in temples and palaces.
  2. Floral and Geometric Designs: The remnants of decorative motifs bear similarities to Hindu carvings, which often emphasized nature-based patterns.kale khan ka gumbad
  3. Material Use and Construction Style: The tomb’s construction techniques show similarities to pre-Islamic invasion stone masonry methods, possibly hinting at skilled Hindu artisans working on the monument.kale khan ka gumbad

Historical Significance and Legacy

Built during the Lodhi period (1451–1526 CE), Kale Khan Ka Gumbad is an example of the transition between Delhi Sultanate architecture and the later Mughal style. The structure reflects the simplicity of Lodhi tombs while incorporating indigenous architectural traditions. Today, the tomb remains a lesser-known monument, overshadowed by grander structures in Delhi.

kale khan ka gumbad

Conclusion

Kale Khan Ka Gumbad is a fascinating piece of Delhi’s architectural history, showcasing the fusion of Indo-Islamic and indigenous Hindu elements. Whether these influences are due to repurposed materials, skilled Indian artisans, or a deeper cultural exchange, they highlight how architectural styles evolved in medieval India. Preserving such monuments and conducting further research to find out the actual primary monument is necessary. The authentic research is required also because the society must understand and accept the results of the islamic invasion which has marked a hard blow to all the suffered Hindus and the temples.

kale khan ka gumbad

Jantar Mantar

Jantar Mantar: An Astronomical Marvel of the 18th Century

Jantar Mantar in Delhi is one of five astronomical observatories built by Maharaja Jai Singh II of Jaipur in 1724. Designed to aid in the precise measurement of celestial movements, this observatory was an ambitious scientific project that sought to refine astronomical calculations and improve timekeeping. The name “Jantar Mantar” is derived from the Sanskrit words “Yantra” (instrument) and “Mantra” (formula or calculation), symbolizing its function as an advanced astronomical tool.

Architectural and Scientific Significance

Unlike traditional buildings, Jantar Mantar is a collection of massive geometric instruments crafted from stone and masonry, each serving a distinct purpose in astronomical observations. The key instruments include:

  1. Samrat Yantra – A giant sundial that measures time with remarkable accuracy, capable of recording time to an accuracy of 2 seconds.

  2. Jai Prakash Yantra – A hemispherical structure with markings that help determine celestial altitudes and positions.
  3. Misra Yantra – A complex instrument designed to determine the longest and shortest days of the year, as well as the exact moment of noon in various cities worldwide.

  4. Rama Yantra – Used to measure the altitude and azimuth of celestial bodies.

Each of these instruments was built to function without the use of telescopes, relying entirely on shadows and alignments to track planetary and solar movements.

Purpose and Historical Context

Maharaja Jai Singh II, an ardent scholar of astronomy, constructed Jantar Mantar to improve upon existing astronomical tables and correct errors in planetary positions recorded in earlier texts. The observatory was built at a time when Indian astronomy had fallen behind advancements in the Islamic and European worlds. Jai Singh’s initiative sought to revive and modernize India’s astronomical studies, ensuring more precise celestial predictions for astrological, navigational, and administrative purposes.

Jantar Mantar in Delhi was the first of the five observatories he built, followed by those in Jaipur, Ujjain, Varanasi, and Mathura. These observatories played a crucial role in reforming the Indian calendar, refining astrological predictions, and aiding in timekeeping for religious and governmental functions.

Legacy and Preservation

Jantar Mantar remains an architectural and scientific wonder, attracting historians, scientists, and tourists alike. Despite its brilliance, many of its functions have become obsolete with the advent of modern astronomical instruments. However, it stands today as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, preserving the legacy of Jai Singh II’s scientific advancements.

Conclusion

Jantar Mantar is more than just a collection of stone instruments—it is a symbol of India’s historical contributions to astronomy. Its unique design and purpose demonstrate the scientific spirit of the 18th century and the ambition of Maharaja Jai Singh II to bring precision and accuracy to celestial calculations. Today, it serves as an enduring reminder of India’s rich heritage in astronomical studies and architectural innovation.

 

Jamali Kamali

Jamali Kamali: A Monument Shrouded in Mystery and Architectural Enigma

Nestled within the Mehrauli Archaeological Park, the Jamali Kamali Mosque and Tomb stand as an exquisite yet enigmatic structure from the Mughal era (16th century). The monument is named after the Sufi saint and poet Sheikh Fazlullah, known as Jamali, and an unknown figure referred to as Kamali, whose identity remains a mystery. While officially regarded as an Islamic structure, several architectural elements within the complex hint at possible pre-Islamic origins, leading to speculation that it might have been built over an earlier Hindu site.

Architectural Brilliance of Jamali Kamali

The complex consists of two main structures: the mosque and the tomb, both exhibiting exquisite red sandstone and marble craftsmanship. The mosque features intricate floral motifs, geometric designs, and calligraphy, while the tomb houses an ornately decorated chamber adorned with glazed tilework and Persian inscriptions.

Key Architectural Features:

  1. Ornate Arches and Domes: The arches display a fusion of Indo-Islamic styles, yet certain decorative elements bear similarities to Hindu temple carvings.
  2. Eaves (Chhajja) and Pillars: The overhanging eaves, supported by carved brackets, bear resemblance to those in Hindu and Jain temples.
  3. Floral and Lotus Motifs: Hindu temple iconography often includes lotus and floral engravings, some of which appear subtly within the tomb and mosque interiors.
  4. Use of Spolia: Several stones and carved elements appear repurposed, hinting at materials taken from pre-existing Hindu structures.
  5. Oriented Courtyard Layout: While mosques typically align towards Mecca, some aspects of the open courtyard and pillar placements suggest possible modifications from an earlier structure.

Hindu Temple Influences and Possible Pre-Islamic Past

Despite being a celebrated Mughal-era site, certain features raise questions about its origins:

  1. Reused Materials: Many medieval Islamic structures in Delhi, including the Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque, were built using stones and pillars from dismantled Hindu and Jain temples. Similar signs can be seen at Jamali Kamali.
  2. Architectural Continuity: The integration of Hindu-style brackets, eaves, and lotus motifs suggests the involvement of artisans familiar with temple architecture.
  3. Absence of Clear Historical Records: Unlike other prominent Mughal structures, there is little documentation on the original foundation of Jamali Kamali, leaving room for speculation.

The Supernatural Mystique of Jamali Kamali

Adding to its intrigue, Jamali Kamali is considered one of Delhi’s most haunted sites. Many visitors have reported eerie experiences, from whispers and shadows to inexplicable sensations. The presence of an unverified burial (Kamali’s identity remains unknown) further fuels speculation about the site’s mysterious past.

Conclusion

The Jamali Kamali Mosque and Tomb remain a fascinating example of Indo-Islamic architecture, but their subtle Hindu influences and reused architectural elements open up possibilities of a pre-existing sacred site. While it stands today as an important Mughal-era monument, further archaeological and historical investigations might uncover layers of history hidden beneath its striking facade. Whether it was built over a former Hindu temple or simply incorporated elements from one, Jamali Kamali continues to be one of Delhi’s most intriguing historical enigmas.


Dadi Poti’s Tombs

Dadi Poti’s Tombs: A Forgotten Legacy with Echoes of a Hindu Past

Nestled within the historic fabric of Delhi, Dadi Poti’s Tombs are a pair of enigmatic structures attributed to the Lodhi-era (15th century). These tombs, smaller in scale yet architecturally intriguing, stand as silent sentinels of a past that may hold deeper layers of history than their current Islamic identity suggests. The presence of Hindu temple elements in their construction raises the possibility that these tombs were built over an earlier sacred site, repurposing existing structures or materials.

dadi poti tombs hauz khas

Architectural Features of Dadi Poti’s Tombs

The two tombs, colloquially referred to as Dadi (grandmother) and Poti (granddaughter), differ in size but share common architectural characteristics of Indo-Islamic design. Constructed using rubble masonry, they exhibit pointed arches, domes, and symmetrical layouts, elements synonymous with Sultanate-era tombs.

Key Architectural Elements:

  1. Dome Structure: The larger tomb (Dadi) has a more elaborate dome, while the smaller one (Poti) is simpler but follows similar construction techniques.
  2. Arched Entrances: The entrances bear clear Indo-Islamic influences, yet some of the detailing suggests pre-existing structural elements.

  3. Eaves (Chhajja) and Brackets: The stone eaves resemble Hindu temple canopies, a feature seen in pre-Islamic architecture.

  4. Carved Details: Subtle floral and geometric patterns bear resemblance to Hindu temple motifs, suggesting either an adaptation or the use of salvaged material.

    choti gumti hauz khas

Hindu Temple Influences and Possible Pre-Islamic Origins

Despite being recognized as Islamic tombs, various architectural cues hint at a possible Hindu origin:

  1. Floral and Lotus Motifs: Hindu temples prominently use lotus symbols, and faint traces of such designs can be observed in the tomb’s stonework.
  2. Use of Spolia: The possibility of recycled temple material in the construction aligns with the historical precedent of Sultanate structures incorporating elements from earlier Hindu and Jain sites.

  3. Structural Orientation: While Islamic tombs are often oriented towards Mecca, some aspects of these tombs’ layouts suggest an adaptation of an earlier sacred structure rather than an entirely new construction.
  4. Absence of Inscriptions: Unlike grander Islamic tombs, these structures lack extensive inscriptions, leaving gaps in their definitive historical narrative and allowing speculation about their original purpose.


    choti gumti hauz khas

A Silent Testament to Delhi’s Evolving Landscape

Dadi Poti’s Tombs stand as remnants of Delhi’s ever-evolving architectural and cultural landscape. Their presence, alongside other medieval structures, highlights the city’s long history of transformation, adaptation, and religious intermingling. Whether these tombs were built over a pre-existing Hindu site or simply integrated elements from one, they remain a fascinating case for further exploration.

Conclusion

Though modest in scale, Dadi Poti’s Tombs embody an intriguing historical puzzle. Their Islamic identity is undeniable, yet subtle traces of Hindu influence—from floral motifs to reused architectural elements—spark curiosity about their true origins. Whether they stand over an earlier Hindu religious site or simply borrowed from one, these tombs add to Delhi’s rich tapestry of layered histories, waiting to be uncovered by deeper archaeological and scholarly inquiry.

Choti Gumti

Choti Gumti: An Overlooked Jewel of Hauz Khas

Tucked away in the historic precincts of Hauz Khas, Choti Gumti is a small yet architecturally significant monument dating back to the Lodhi-era (15th century). Despite its modest size, this tomb carries historical and cultural importance, adding to the medieval charm of Delhi. Though often overshadowed by grander structures, Choti Gumti’s design and construction hint at a layered past that may predate its Islamic identity.

choti gumti hauz khas

Architectural Features of Choti Gumti

Built using rubble masonry, Choti Gumti follows a simple yet elegant design that is characteristic of Lodhi-era tombs. It features a square base, topped with a hemispherical dome, creating a striking yet understated aesthetic. The tomb has three arched entrances, with one wall sealed off, possibly housing a mihrab (prayer niche).

choti gumti hauz khas

Key Architectural Elements:

  1. Dome with Finial: The large central dome gives the structure a majestic appearance, typical of Lodhi-era tombs.
  2. Arched Entrances: The pointed arches showcase Indo-Islamic influences, yet some detailing hints at earlier architectural traditions.
  3. Eaves (Chhajja): The overhanging eaves resemble those found in temple structures, suggesting possible Hindu artisan involvement in construction.
  4. Decorative Elements: The brackets and some stonework bear stylistic similarities to Hindu temple architecture, raising the possibility of repurposed material.

    choti gumti hauz khas

Hindu Temple Influences and Possible Pre-Islamic Past

While officially classified as an Islamic tomb, certain features of Choti Gumti suggest a possible Hindu origin:

  1. Floral and Lotus Motifs: Hindu temples prominently use lotus symbols, some of which appear faintly in the decorative elements of Choti Gumti.
  2. Use of Spolia: Many Lodhi-era structures, including those in Mehrauli and Hauz Khas, reused material from older Hindu and Jain temples.
  3. Alignment with Vastu Shastra: Hindu temple structures follow sacred geometry, and certain elements of Choti Gumti’s layout hint at an earlier structure’s adaptation.
  4. Historical Precedent: Several Islamic monuments in Delhi, including the Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque, were built using material from demolished temples. Choti Gumti might follow a similar historical pattern.

    choti gumti hauz khas

Choti Gumti’s Role in the Hauz Khas Landscape

Positioned in the Hauz Khas area, which was once a significant medieval center, Choti Gumti adds to the rich architectural legacy of the region. Its presence, along with other tombs and structures from the Delhi Sultanate, reflects the political and cultural shifts that shaped Delhi’s landscape over centuries.

choti gumti hauz khas

Conclusion

Choti Gumti, though a small structure, carries an immense historical enigma. Officially considered a Lodhi-era tomb, its subtle Hindu influences and architectural anomalies suggest a more complex history—possibly tied to a pre-Islamic past. Whether it was built over an existing Hindu site or simply incorporated Hindu elements remains a mystery, one that requires deeper archaeological study to unravel the full story of this forgotten gem in Hauz Khas.

choti gumti hauz khas

Biran Ka Gumbad

Biran Ka Gumbad: A converted site?

Nestled in the urban sprawl of South Delhi, Biran Ka Gumbad is a lesser-known yet intriguing monument from the Lodhi-era (15th century). This solitary tomb, built in the distinct Indo-Islamic architectural style, stands as a silent witness to Delhi’s layered history. Though officially classified as an Islamic funerary structure, closer examination reveals traces of Hindu temple architecture, raising the question of whether this site had a Hindu past before the tomb was erected.

biran ka gumbad

Architectural Features of Biran Ka Gumbad

Biran Ka Gumbad is a square tomb, crowned by a massive dome, a characteristic feature of Sultanate-era architecture. The structure is made of rubble masonry which is beleived to be added during the conversion of the ancient site. It displays intricate detailing on its arched entrances and mihrab (prayer niche). The tomb follows the common Lodhi-era design, with minimal ornamentation and a strong emphasis on geometric forms.

biran ka gumbad

Key Architectural Elements:

  1. Dome with a Finial: The tomb features a large hemispherical dome, typical of Islamic mausoleums.biran ka gumbad
  2. Arched Doorways: The structure has pointed arches, a signature of Indo-Islamic architecture, yet their framing exhibits detailing reminiscent of earlier temple gateways.biran ka gumbad
  3. Ornate Eaves (Chhajja): The overhanging eaves bear resemblance to temple mandapas, suggesting the involvement of Hindu artisans.
  4. Pillared Niches and Decorative Brackets: Some of the supporting elements inside the structure resemble carved brackets seen in Hindu temples, hinting at either inspiration or repurposed material.
  5. Presence of a Well: A well located near the tomb adds to the mystery of the site. Wells were commonly found near Hindu temples for ritual purification, and its presence here raises the possibility that the site may have once served a religious function before being repurposed.biran ka gumbad
    biran ka gumbad

Hindu Temple Influences in Biran Ka Gumbad

Despite its Islamic association, several architectural features suggest a potential pre-Islamic or Hindu origin:

  1. Use of Spolia: Many Sultanate-era structures, including those in Mehrauli and Hauz Khas, incorporated materials from earlier Hindu and Jain temples. Certain stone blocks in Biran Ka Gumbad show signs of earlier carvings, now either erased or reworked.biran ka gumbad
  2. Floral and Lotus Motifs: The presence of lotus designs on the remaining fragments suggests Hindu artistic influence.
  3. Alignment and Sacred Geometry: Hindu temples were constructed based on Vastu Shastra, ensuring alignment with celestial and directional principles. The orientation of Biran Ka Gumbad does not perfectly align with later Islamic tombs, raising the possibility that it was adapted from a pre-existing site.biran ka gumbad

Possibility of a Pre-existing Hindu Site

Several factors fuel the speculation that Biran Ka Gumbad was built over or incorporated elements from an Ancient Hindu structure:

  • Historical Patterns: Many Lodhi-era structures were built using repurposed temple materials. The Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque and other monuments demonstrate similar adaptations.
  • Structural Discrepancies: The use of specific stonework and brackets that were not traditionally part of early Sultanate tomb construction suggests remnants of an earlier sacred site.
  • Lack of Inscriptional Evidence: Unlike prominent Islamic tombs, Biran Ka Gumbad lacks significant inscriptions or clear historical records, leaving its origins open to debate.biran ka gumbad

Conclusion

Biran Ka Gumbad stands as an architectural enigma, reflecting Delhi’s complex history of cultural transitions. While officially recognized as a Lodhi-era tomb, the presence of Hindu temple motifs, reused materials, and structural inconsistencies hints at a deeper past—perhaps one rooted in religious traditions prior to the Islamic invasions. The presence of a well near the tomb further strengthens this theory, as it was a crucial feature in Hindu temple complexes. More research and archaeological exploration could unveil the monument’s true origins, adding yet another layer to Delhi’s rich and diverse heritage.

biran ka gumbad