Freeing Hindu temples from government control

Freeing Hindu temples from government control is a demand that is vociferously heard and debated in many platforms. The matter is also raised by politicians during elections and is forgotten soon after that. The Hindu temples continues to be milch cows for politicians as they toil hard in their pursuit of power.

 

In this regard it is essential to learn few facts, the geneses and evolution of the state control of Hindu temples.

 

British colonial administration

 

When Bharat was ruled by Kings in the ancient and recent past, many grand temples were constructed under royal patronage. It was customary on part of Kings to set aside the land and produce of villages to meet the expenses incurred in the worship and rituals of the Deity. Small temples had only few villages assigned to them, but larger temples had hundreds of villages whose land revenue and produce were used for the purposes of the Deity. Eventually all these lands were considered as belonging to the Presiding Deity of the temple.

 

This continued for a long time till the advent of the British. The British slowly took over the reigns of the various princely states of Bharat. The East India company enacted laws enabling the vesting in itself, the superintendence of all the lands granted for support of Hindu temples. This enabled the colonial administration to tap into the land revenue and also the gold and wealth of Hindu temples.

 

This however had another facet. The colonial administration also got entangled in the administration of Hindu temples. The officers of the British East India company involved and participated in the various rituals and festivals of the Hindu temples. The England at that time was not a secular state. The “Act of Supremacy” enacted in 1534 declared that the monarch was the “Supreme Head of the Church of England”. The participation of the colonial administration in rituals and festivals of Hindu temples angered the Christian missionaries and the Church.

 

Back in England, the missionaries and the clergy exerted their influence on the British government and knocked the highest echelons of the East India Company. As a result in 1833, the Court of Directors of the company issued instructions asking all the officer to desists from the administration of Hindu temples and participation in the Hindu festivals. The order went thus “The interference of British Functionaries in the interior management of native temples, in the customs, habits and religious proceedings of their priests and attendants, in the arrangement of their ceremonies, rites and festivals, and generally in the conduct of their interior economy, shall cease.”

 

The colonial government further reinforced their intent to keep away from temple administration when in 1863 a law was enacted which said that it would no longer be “lawful” for “any Government in India, or for any Officer of any Government” in his official capacity, to take over the “superintendence of any land or other property” belonging to a “Mosque, Temple, or other religious establishment”, to take part in the “management or appropriation of any [religious] endowment”, to nominate or appoint any trustee in a religious institution, “or to be in any way concerned therewith”. It was clear from this that the British considered the administration of Hindu temples as a burden and wanted to keep away from it. This ended the brief period where the British colonial government controlled Hindu temples. All Hindu temples were freed from the colonial administration.

 

Indian politicians enter the fray

 

However things again changed with the Government of India Act of 1919. As per the Act, elected legislators or Indian politicians entered the British Indian administration. Certain subjects were reserved by British government for administration by elected legislature and they were termed provincial subjects. The politicians found it suited to follow the British policy of suppression and oppression rather than fight the British. These politicians behaved like the loyal slaves of British, trying their best not to offend them in any manner. They carefully charted their path accordingly.

 

In 1926 Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act was passed by Indian politicians, taking over the administration of all temples in the Madras state. This sowed the seeds of administration of Hindu temples in modern India. Strangely it was the Indian politicians and not the British who fathered this monstrous law which is being used by every government to extract temple revenue to suit their own purposes. The Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act was duplicated in many states soon, as every politician wanted a share of the wealth belonging to Hindu Deities and was looking for ingenious ways for a legalized loot.

 

Conditions remain the same ever after close to a century since the first law to control Hindu temples was enacted. As of now there are more than 300 legislation and rules which enable governments to interfere on temple administration. The existence of various state governments is intrinsically linked to the money they manage to loot from Hindu temples under the guise of various schemes.

 

When it comes to looting Hindu temples, all politicians have showed remarkable ingenuity in hiving off its wealth. While politicians like Devendra Phadnavis used temple money to finance his irrigation and development schemes, politicians like Narendra Modi wanted temple gold to be invested in certain Tughlaq schemes of his making.

 

The path ahead

 

We have done an analysis of the various legislations by which governments interfere in temple administration. This is available for download via reclaimtemples.com/templelaws

 

The path ahead is sure to be interesting as we are fighting against a well entrenched enemy who will use all the wealth of Hindu temples against any attempt to displace them from temple administration. Also even if the governments are vacated from Hindu temples, there will be an influx of the clans, cults, mathas of various hues who will try to take over all the wealthy temples. A solution is to have a system where the top executive and decision making body is elected democratically by all devotees of the temple. We have made a draft law of temple administration and it can be downloaded from here. Admistration of Hindu temples Draft Act v 2.1, 2020

 

On our part we will start the legal process where the oppressive legislations will be targeted one by one and state by state. This is ultimately a process which needs to end in agitation for success to be visible. This is a small step in this regard. Ultimately this is a fight for Hindu society and the outcome will depend on the participation of general public. Any contribution can be made via imojo.in/legal

 

#ReclaimTemples

Hindu temples under Islamic occupation

We give below, state-wise and district-wise, the particulars of Muslim monuments which stand on the sites and/or have been built with the materials of Hindu temples, and which we wish to recall as witnesses to the role of Islam as a religion and the character of Muslim rule in medieval India. The list is the result of a preliminary survey. Many more Muslim monuments await examination. Local traditions which have so far been ignored or neglected, have to be tapped on a large scale.

 

We have tried our best to be exact in respect of locations, names and dates of the monuments mentioned. Even so, some mistakes and confusions may have remained. It is not unoften that different sources provide different dates and names for the same monument. Many Muslim saints are known by several names, which creates confusion in identifying their mazars or dargahs. Some districts have been renamed or newly, created and a place which was earlier under one district may have been included in another. We shall be grateful to readers who point out these mistakes so that they can be corrected in our major study. This is only a brief summary.

Sita Ram Goel

 

It should be kept in mind that the list below doesn’t include all the temples destroyed by Muslims and which were converted to mosques. The below is the list of mosques and Darghas where evidences exists of having been made after destroying the temples at these locations. In many mosques, Muslim rulers were able to eradicate all signs of temples, and hence not given in below list. Also the list is based on the list prepared by Sitaram Goel in 1990, hence the list correspond to the geography of the state and districts as it existed then.

 

Anyone is free to visit the below list of mosques and see the remnants and materials of Hindu temples. Archaeological Survey of India should conduct an excavation of below mosques to find out more about the ancient temples in these locations and possible mass graves around the mosque sites.

 

Andhra Pradesh : Click here to download PDF

Assam : Click here to download PDF

Bengal : Click here to download PDF

Bihar : Click here to download PDF

Delhi : Click here to download PDF

Diu : Click here to download PDF

Gujarat : Click here to download PDF

Haryana : Click here to download PDF

Himachal Pradesh : Click here to download PDF

Karnataka : Click here to download PDF

Kashmir : Click here to download PDF

Kerala : Click here to download PDF

Lakshadweep : Click here to download PDF

Madhya Pradesh : Click here to download PDF

Maharashtra : Click here to download PDF

Odisha : Click here to download PDF

Punjab : Click here to download PDF

Rajasthan : Click here to download PDF

Tamil Nadu : Click here to download PDF

Uttar Pradesh : Click here to download PDF

 

A Hindu temple remains so till eternity as PranaPratishta is done during the consecration. And being perpetual minors the property rights of the Deity are never abated as per law. Our Gods are lying mutilated in Hindu temple sites across Bharat awaiting resurrection and revival of worship. Be part of the movement to #ReclaimTemples

#LightALamp to revive our ancestral temples

The glory of Hindu civilisation is well evident in the magnificent temples and extra ordinary architectural skills imbibed in them. Many of these temples were centers of divine energy which helps the devotees during their various stages of life and even as cure for their maladies. The Hindu Gods and Goddesses consecrated at these temple sites were believed to have protected the people and the people in turn protected them.

However during the dark days of Islamic invasion of Bharat, lakhs of Hindu temples were destroyed across Bharat and they now lies in ruins as mute witness to the barbaricity of the invading hordes. Worse is the fact that many of these temple sites are abandoned by Hindus and even the customary rituals and Poojas are not done.

We have started #LightALamp initiative where we will be reviving worship in as many Hindu temples as possible, either in ruins or abandoned or neglected by the local population.

The revival will start with devotees lighting a lamp, as simple as an earthen lamp at the temple site. This can be done by anybody and accompanied by mantras if a person is well versed in it. The offering of fire to the Deity will rekindle the Divinity of the place and the revival of whole temple will happen in due time.

We have found that many often the people who are willing to restart Poojas and worship doesn’t have money or resources. To lend a helping hand and attempting to restart worship, we will be providing Rs. 2000 per month for 6 months for meeting expenses of temples where Poojas are not done, to ameliorate the difficulty faced and for starting worship in new temple sites. We believe that initial assistance will help individuals to restart worship at these abandoned ruins in his locality . And in another six months the devotees themselves can share the expenses and continue the Poojas.

We request you to support such initiative in your ancestral village or locality and contribute towards the same directly to the person reviving the worship. Together we can build #ReclaimTemples movement and ensure that no Hindu temple in Bharat lies abandoned, no Deity in Bharat is devoid of their due worship.

If you would like to connect us to such ancient temples which needs attention, please download our Android app via reclaimtemples.com/android and submit the details of the temple.

To become a volunteer in your district, please register with us via imojo.in/dharma

#ReclaimTemples

Destruction of Hindu temples in Goa by Christian fanatics

Article by @OGSaffron

While the destruction of Hindu temples by Muslim invaders gets most of the discussion spotlight, and understandably so, an exposition of anti-Hindu iconoclasm by anti-Dharmic forces would remain incomplete if it did not mention the Christian iconoclastic campaigns against Hindu society. Therefore, this brief essay correctly positions Hindu-Christian encounters as not the intercultural meeting of two distributed groups but instead a story of Hindu survival against the crusading spirit of anti-idolatry.

With that in mind, the tragic story of Goa resembles the religious nature characteristic of the destruction of Hindu temples by Muslim invaders. Indeed, and much to the chagrin of secular revisionists of Indian history, the story of Hindu survival in Goa against Christian conquistadores is rooted in the intransigence of proselytism, even though secularists would have laymen believe it to be originating from Brahmanical stubbornness that should have otherwise been receptive to the messages of Christ. Or emanating from the impatience of a heathen population already content with their ancestral traditions; or from other re-contextualizations of similar deconstruction.

In truth, the campaign against Hindu heathenry was driven by the old Judeo-Christian hostility against idolatry (Henn, 2014). Such hostility provided Christian conquistadores the perfect theological justification for both colonial conquest and the destruction of Hindu temples (Henn, 2014). In other words, not primarily a political and/or economic justification, but a staunchly religious one, as something contentious secularists purposefully hesitate to categorize. For the Hindus of Goa, this meant a ferocious and humiliating experience of subjugation. By the second half of the sixteenth century, Portuguese-Catholic forces “launched a ferocious iconoclastic campaign against Hindu culture in India that seemed to bring an end to all ambiguities and confusions regarding the identities of gentiles and Christians” (Henn, 2014, p. 40). This ferocious campaign was “directed primarily against Hindu temples and images, and affected above all India’s western coast” (Henn, 2014, p. 40).

Steeped in the old Judeo-Christian hostility against idolatry, and likely against anything outside the Abrahamic fold that embodied a cultural sophistication not sanctioned or approved by monotheistic centralization, the iconoclastic campaign devastated Goa between 1540 and 1560 (Henn, 2014). These two decades were marked by a demoralizing devastation of Hindu Goa; all Hindu temples, shrines, and images were destroyed or removed (Henn, 2014). Furthermore, the performance of public Hindu rituals was banned and actively suppressed (Henn, 2014). By 1600, most Hindus who did not convert to Christianity were either expelled or fled Goa (Henn, 2014).

Like the mosques built on top of destroyed Hindu temples by Muslim invaders, purposefully embodying architectural expressions of conquest over heathenry, so too did the Christian foreign intruders destroy Hindu temples in order to replace them with Christian images and monuments of victory (Henn, 2014). In this regard the destruction of Hindu temples by both Muslim and Christian invaders converge in that their anti-idolatry campaigns go from “a war against images [to] a war between images” (Henn, 2014, p. 40). For Goa, the significance of this change meant that the destruction of Hindu temples was outstandingly systematic, resulting in a drastic alteration of its architectural landscape.

The campaign to eradicate Hindu images was so intense that Portuguese Christians “did not just target singular and outstanding religious landmarks” (Henn, 2014, p. 41). Instead, they “systematically destroyed all Hindu temples, shrines, and images,” replacing them with Christian equivalents, which went on to birth a distinct European-Christian architectural development largely devoid of the previous traditional Hindu form that once ornamented the land praised as the Kashi of Konkan (Henn, 2014, p. 41). To quote the Portuguese poet Camoes, “Goa [was] taken from the infidel [in order to] keep severely in check the idolatrous heathen” (Henn, 2014, p. 40). And Goa was indeed taken from Goan Hindus, their images and monuments destroyed, and their public performance of Hindu rituals banned. In fact, Christian explorers like Afonso de Sousa came to India with premeditated plans to attack and destroy Hindu temples (Flores, 2007; Henn, 2014).

Premeditation of this sort affected even the Hindus of Sri Lanka, another focal point unsurprisingly driven by the old Judeo-Christian hostility against idolatry (Flores, 2007). For example, when Portuguese Christians destroyed the ancient Hindu temples of Tirukkovil and Palukamam, they adversely, and purposefully, affected Shaivism in the region (Flores, 2007). Possessed by the conviction of having an exclusive access to an absolute truth, the meeting of heathenry with monotheistic centralization was usually a history of the former attempting to survive the salvific cruelty of the latter. One may find many other examples from a deeper study of similar interactions. Yet the theme of such encounters, whether they were between Hindus and Muslims or Hindus and Christians, remained the same: destruction of heathenry in favor of a fanaticism obsessed with salvific preaching that soon but naturally turned iconoclastic.


Flores, J. (Ed.). (2007). Re-exploring the links: History and constructed histories between Portugal and Sri Lanka. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.

Henn, A. (2014). Hindu-Catholic encounters in Goa: Religion, colonialism, and modernity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.