Tracing the Yoginis in Delhi

Article By Poorvaa Malhotra

Delhi, the capital of India, has witnessed countless stories, cultures, and commotions. The name of the city, as Dilli or Dihli and later Delhi, was popularised under the Muhammadan rule. However, long before the Mughals, literary sources and epigraphic evidence record there was a series of names that reflected successive phases of Delhi’s past.

Building on this, the earliest references to the region can be traced in the Mahabharata as Indraprastha, the capital of the Pandavas. By the early medieval period, the city was known as Dhillika (or Dhillipura) during the reign of Anangpal Tomar II, a ruler of the Tomara dynasty. The Tomaras, a Rajput clan, ruled parts of present-day Delhi and Haryana, establishing the region as a political center.

Continuing through history, epigraphic evidence belonging to the Sultanate period further confirms the use of this name in later periods. A Sanskrit inscription from Palam (Palamba), located to southwest of Delhi, records the excavation of a Baoli by a noble named Udhdhara Thakkura during the reign of Sultan Ghiyas-ud-din Balban in Vikrama Samvat 1333 (1276 CE). The inscription mentions the ancient names of Delhi, including Dhilli and Dhillika in the Haryanvi-Bagri dialect. Later, European travellers such as Bernier referred to it as Dehli and Tavernier as Dehly. The latter part of the inscription gives a poetic name to Delhi as Yoginipura, the “city of yoginis” or the “fairy city,” which is prosperous and jewel-like.

Figure 1: Mention of Yoginipura in Palam Baoli Inscription Source: Rajendralal Mitra

This highlights the religious practice of the yogini cult, which was prevalent in the city before the Islamic rule. The article explores the spiritual aspects of the city, which was once blessed with the presence of Yoginis and Shakti cult.

Who Are Yoginis?

Preceding the Mamluk Dynasty, which was established during the Islamic rule, Delhi was under the control of the Tomars and later by the Chauhans.  The Tomars built the fortified city of Lal Kot in the eleventh century, which was later expanded by the Chauhan rulers into the Qila Rai Pithora. The region was a sacred landscape with cultic worship of Shaiva and Sakta. Within the Sakta tradition, the cult of the Yoginīs held particular significance. Their cult flourished across various regions of early medieval India, often connected with Tantric ritual, sacred geography, and royal patronage.

Rooted in early Śākta and Kaula practices, Yoginīs are known as goddesses and semi-divine beings. The word ‘yogini’ holds different meanings and understandings. The primary meaning of ‘Yogini’ in Sanskrit is given as a female devotee, generally the counterpart of Yogi; a fairy or a goddess. While the Vedic and Puranic texts identify Yogini as forms of Durga or attendants of goddesses. In Buddhism, the yoginis are known as ḍākinī, which means ‘sky-goers’ and is generally associated with liberation.

The origins of the Yoginī cult can be traced back to early Indian literature, as mentioned in the Mahābhārata (around the 4th century BCE to 4th century CE). The Śalya Parva records 200 Mothers (Mātṛgaṇas) accompanying Skanda (Kumāra). These female characters are described as having alluring features such as sharp teeth, long nails, protruding lips, and round bellies. They are said to originate from major gods like Yama, Rudra, Indra, Agni, Varuṇa, Vāyu, Kubera, Soma, Brahmā, and Skanda himself.  According to Vidiya Dehejia in her book Yogini Cult and Tradition (1986), these Mātṛgaṇas likely indicate their role as precursors to later goddess groups such as the Yoginīs. The concept of Aṣṭa Mātr̥kās (Eight Mother Goddesses), as mentioned in Agni Purāṇa, also supports this. It explains that each Mātr̥kā is a group of eight Yoginīs, which equals sixty-four in total.

There are references to Yoginis in major Indian Literary texts, including the Vedas and Puranas including Agni Purāņa, Skanda Purāņa, and the Kālikā Purāņa, that offer details about significance, concept, siddhis, cultic worship, and nāmāvalīs. The Skanda Purāṇa lists Yoginī names such as Durgā, Gaurī, Kātyāyanī, Cāmuṇḍā, Mahāmāyā, and Bhrāmarī.

Tantric texts such as the Jayadratha Yamala, Brahma Yamala, and Kaulajñānanirṇaya has references for Yoginīs as early as the 8th century CE. The Tantric traditions often term Yogini as a powerful female being with supernatural capacities (siddhis).  These are referred to as the doctrine of the aṣṭa-mahāsiddhis (eight great supernatural powers), which is mentioned in Patañjali’s Yogasūtras and later has commentaries by Vyāsa and King Bhoja.

The eight siddhis are:

  1. Aṇimā – the power of becoming minute as an atom
  2. Mahimā – the power of becoming a giant
  3. Laghimā – lightness in weight that can travel in the air faster
  4. Garimā –heaviness in weight which no one can move
  5. Prākāmya – ability to understand and control the mind
  6. Īśitva – control is control over the mind and body of others and self
  7. Vaśitva – control over natural elements
  8. Kāmāvasāyitā – fulfillment of all desires

Figure 2 Yogini Cakra Source: suryanamaskara.altervista.org

Yoginis occupy a central role in Kaula Tantra, particularly within the practice of Cakra-pūjā. TheYoginī Cakra, also known as the Kaula Cakra or Bhairavī Cakra in Kaula practice, is an important element. The worship of the Yoginī cult involved offerings of wine, flesh, and blood, reflecting their fierce Śākta nature. The Kaula path mentions the use of the pañca-makāras:

  • Matsya (fish)
  • Māṁsa (meat)
  • Mudrā (parched grain)
  • Madya (liquor)
  • Maithuna (sexual intercourse)

Another significant aspect of yogini is numerical symbolism, like the 64 Yoginis, known as the Chausath Yoginis. These are related to manifestations of the Goddess Devi, such as Durga, and their worship began in the 9th to the 12th century CE, particularly within the temples. In essence, the Yoginis are the energies having divine powers depicted in the form of female guardians.The historical literature Kalhaṇa’s Rājataraṅgiṇī gives accounts of Yoginis who turn men into animals using their magical powers.

Furthermore, Yoginis are captured in paintings and sculptural forms, particularly in the early medieval period. The most striking feature of Yoginī sculpture is its theriomorphic iconography. The body of the Yoginī remains that of a human, and the head is depicted in animal forms, including Ajananā (goat-faced), Vṛṣānana (buffalo-faced), Śaśānana (hare-faced), and Gomukhī (cow-faced). The Kāśī Khaṇḍa of the Skanda Purāṇa mentions such sixty-four animal-faced Yoginīs, which are also carved in a number of temples across central and eastern India. These depict the supernatural forms of Yoginis as described in Tantric literature and folklore. Despite their frightful expressions, Yoginis are also shown seated in lalitāsana or standing calmly. Weapons, skull-cups, clubs, tridents, and skull garlands serve as markers of fierceness.

Figure 3: Shashanana Source: Anamika Roy

Figure 4: Yogini Kalyani, Rajasthan Pianting, 19th century Source: Dehejia 1986

Figure 5: Yogini Kapali, Rajasthan Pianting, 19th century Source: Dehejia 1986

In contrast to temple sculpture, Yoginīs are beautifully painted on the canvas of Mughal and Rajput miniature paintings.  These are shown in various forms doing different activities, including forest scenes where she is seated under a tree, and a lion is bowing to her in respect. This reflects their supernatural nature, or the meditative postures show the traditions of female Tantric practitioners during that era. Rajasthani cloth paintings of the late nineteenth century show a blend of these traditions.

Beyond their presence in literature and art, the worship of Yoginīs in Delhi is reflected in surviving religious centre. The Yogmaya Temple, located near the ancient complex of Qila Rai Pithora in Mehrauli, stands as a significant living example reflecting the continuity of Shakta worship in the region.

The Yogmaya Temple

Figure 6: Yogmaya temple, Mehrauli; Image Courtesy: Poorvaa Malhotra (Feb 13, 2026)

The Yogmaya (or Jogmaya ) Temple is one of the significant 51 Sakta Peeths situated in Mehrauli, Delhi, just behind the Qutub Minar complex, and represents powerful expressions of Sakta worship.  The site is identified in local tradition with ancient Yoginipura and is regarded as one of Delhi’s surviving pre-Islamic temples, including historic landmarks such as Anang Tal, Bhool Bhulaiya, Bhairav Temple, and others.

The Story of Yogmaya

In the Hindu philosophy of Advaita Vedānta, the Brahmana has created Yogmaya, an illusion to veil the reality of this world. Maya causes individuals to experience duality, whereas Brahman has non-dual existence. In Vaishnavism, there are two types of Maya: i) Pure Maya/ Mahamaya (Malignant Illusion) and ii) Yogmaya (Divine Illusion) (Kumar, 2006)

नाहं प्रकाश: सर्वस्य योगमायासमावृत: |

मूढोऽयं नाभिजानाति लोको मामजमव्ययम् || 25||

The above verse from the Bhagavad Gita (7.25) states that the true divine nature of Krishna is veiled by his supreme spiritual power, Yogmaya, from others. This veil prevents recognizing Him as the eternal, unborn reality from those who are attached to the worldly illusion. According to the Bhagavata Purana, the goddess Yogmaya is identified as the sister of Lord Krishna. She was born to Krishna’s foster parents, Yashoda and Nanda, in Gokul. In Chapter 4, Canto 10 of Srimad Bhagavatam, it is mentioned that she saved her brother, Krishna, from Kamsa. To express his gratitude, Krishna built the temple in memory of his sister Yogmaya. Names such as Vindhyavasini, Mahamaya, Mahalakshmi, etc., are often associated with the deity.

Alternative texts like the Mahabharat mention the Yogmaya Temple as a sacred place where Krishna and Arjuna used to pray and seek help from the Goddess against Jayadrath, who killed his son Abhimanyu. Other legends suggest that it was built by Yudhishthira after winning the battle.

Royal Patronage

The temple of Goddess Yogmaya has long been associated with royal patronage of Tomars, Chauhans, and later by the Mughals. The goddess Yogmaya was revered as the Kuldevi (family deity) of the Chauhan rulers. The temple has survived the invasions of Islamic forces, including attacks by Mahmud of Ghazni, and retained its religious significance.

According to some sources, Hindu ruler Vikramaditya Hemu reportedly restored the shrine in the 16th century. Later, in 1827, the present structure was rebuilt and renovated by Seth Sidhu Mal, a noble associated with the court of Akbar Shah II. Currently, the temple is under the management of Temple Trust to ensure its continuity as a place of worship for devotees.

In the book Delhi: City of Yoginis by Suphal Kumar, it is mentioned in his conversations with the temple’s caretaker Dayanand, who narrates that the shrine was respected by the Mughal rulers, including Emperor Aurangzeb (1658-1707). Local accounts also suggest that the temple was once the meeting point during the planning of the Revolt of 1857, where leaders like Nana Sahib, Azimullah Khan, Rani Laxmibai, and Veer Kunwar Singh met (Kumar, 2006). This highlights that the temple was not only religiously significant, but it was also a relevant space for political activities.

Architectural Features

Figure 7: Entrance gate that reads Siddha Shri Yogmaya Mandir Image Courtesy: Poorvaa Malhotra Feb 13. 2026

The entrance, marked “Siddha Peetha Shri Yogmaya Mandir,” leads visitors toward the main sanctuary. In contrast to circular hypaethral (roofless) enclosures, the Yogmaya temple has a shikhara-style structure surrounded by residential buildings. Although the present structure is modest, the site is widely regarded as one of the few surviving pre-Islamic temples of Delhi.

Figure 8: Domb Style Shikhara and Arched gateway Image Courtesy: Poorvaa Malhotra Feb 13,2026

The notable architectural feature is the dome-shaped shikhara painted in white and red. At the top, there is a finial (kalasha) and a symbol of “Om”. The entrance is shaped like an arched gateway with multifoil arches, common in late Medieval and colonial-era architecture. It may suggest that the temple underwent significant renovations during the Mughal era and reflects a blend of Indo-Islamic structural elements.

Figure 9: Main Entrance to the Temple Image Courtesy: Poorvaa Malhotra  Feb 13,2026

Upon entering the temple complex, a shoe stand is to the left, followed by a pathway that guides worshippers toward the main shrine. On the right, the wall has carvings of the goddesses, accompanied by two dwarpaals guarding the gateway. The entrance itself is richly adorned with seven-hooded serpents (Shesha) embellished with small pieces of mirror tiles, and below two lion sculptures on either side to show strength and protection. While the temple is ancient and once made of red sandstone, it has now been updated with marble and contemporary tiling, giving it a modern look.

Before entering the garbhagriha (sanctum sanctorum), devotees encounter a beautiful Sanskrit salutation, “Yogmaye Maha Lakshmi Narayani Namostute,” often found in the Devi Mahatmyam to honour Goddess Narayani or Lakshmi.

Figure 10: Gateway to Garbagriha Iamge Courtesy: Poorvaa Malhotra Feb 13,2026

The gates have a carving of four-armed Ganesha standing on a lotus (padma). He is wearing a crown, fine jewellery, and floral garlands with his four arms representing his mastery over the four Vedas and the cardinal directions. The lower right hand shows the Abhay Mudra blessing the devotees entering the garbhagriha, while his lower left holds a modak. In his upper hands, he holds an axe and in the other a noose. The Om is carved above his head and is decorated with floral designs.

Figure 11: Goddess Yogmaya Image Courtesy: Poorvaa Malhotra Feb 13,2026

Stepping through the gate feels like entering a divine abode. At the core of the sanctum, there is the Goddess in her sacred pindi (natural stone) form, which is one and a half feet deep (Kumar, 2006). She is adorned with a circular crown, radiating a beautiful aura, and surrounded by fresh flowers, shringar (ornaments), and prasad. This sacred setting creates a deeply peaceful and holy atmosphere for every devotee. Yogmaya is revered as an incarnation of Adi Shakti Mahalakshmi. According to local legend, the Goddess is worshipped in two distinct parts across India: her head is enshrined in this Delhi temple, while her feet are worshipped as Vindhyavasini at Vindhyachal, near Varanasi. The pandit was generous while offering the prasad and kindly allowed to take a few photographs of Mother Yogmaya. He also said that the five-tiered Chattra (ceremonial umbrella) above the goddess is believed to be 50 years old.

Figure 12: Ceiling Image Courtesy: Poorvaa Malhotra Feb 13, 2026

The dome ceiling of the garbhagriha is a centre of attraction, the Navadurga, including Lakshmi, Saraswati, Chamunda, Shailputri, Skandamata, Chandraghanta, Katyayani, among others, creating a truly heavenly atmosphere.

The daily rituals at the temple begin in the early morning during the Brahma Muhurta (pre-dawn), considered the most auspicious time for spiritual activity, when the bathing ritual (abhisheka) is performed. The head priest is assigned the duty to perform the ritual of bathing Mother with samagree like water, milk, curd, honey, sandalwood paste, red Sindhoor, and cow urine. After the water bath, curd is poured over the deity, followed by preparation of Panchamrita or Charnamrita, which is then distributed to devotees as a blessed offering.

Figure 13: Shivling Image Courtesy: Poorvaa Malhotra Feb13,2026

After offering prayers to the deity, the devotees exit the garbhagriha and continue their spiritual journey by having the darshans of the sacred Shivling. The devotees perform their morning rituals and offerings. Apart from the main sanctum, the temple complex has several niches dedicated to deities, including Ganesha, Hanuman, Ram-Sita with Lakshmana, Radha-Krishna, and Vishnu-Lakshmi. Interestingly, there is also an image of Kalki, the final avatar of Vishnu. These shrines appear to be of a more modern architectural design.

Cultural Significance

Navratri, literally meaning nine nights, is observed twice a year as Vasantik Navratri, also known as Chaitra Navratri, in the month of Chaitra (March-April) and Sharada Navratri in the month of Aswin (October-November). Each nine-day period is dedicated to the worship of Mother in her nine different forms, where devotees fast and offer prayers to the devi. The Yogmaya temple is beautifully decorated with flowers, creating an atmosphere of devotion and festivity. Devotees gather in large numbers and perform Aarti and bhajans to seek blessings from Mother for a prosperous, healthy, and harmonious new year. This nine-day festival, dedicated to the Divine Mother, holds immense cultural and spiritual significance for the local community.

One of the oldest festivals is Phoolwalon ki Sair (Procession of Florists), also known as Sair-e-Gul-Faroshan, which is historically associated with the Yogmaya temple. This is a unique festival that highlights cultural syncretism as it is celebrated by both Hindus and Muslims communities with great enthusiasm and devotion.  Described as the Pankha Mela in the Gazetteer of Delhi District (1883–84), a large procession of people is carried out at the Yogmaya temple and the nearby shrine of the Dargah of Qutbuddin Bakhtiar Kaki, teacher of the Sufi saint Baba Farid, who was the guru of Nizamuddin Auliya. The festival is held during the months of Chaitra and Asoj (Ashwin), specifically on the 8th and 9th days of the lunar calendar in each of these months. Flowers, garlands, pankhas (fans), chaadars (sacred cloths), and chhatars (canopies) are offered at both the temple and the dargah on consecutive days, symbolizing communal harmony and shared respect. Traditionally, the festival is linked to the Mughal patronage of Akbar Shah II and later Bahadur Shah Zafar. Currently, Anjuman Sair-e-Gulfaroshan, a socio-cultural society formed by the first Prime Minister of India, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru in 1962, to promote and preserve the cultural traditions by organising the Phool Walon Ki Sair.

Figure 14: Representation of Traditional Floral Fan by Anjuman Sair E Gulfaroshan, March 2026 Source: www.indiatimes.com

Conclusion

The Yogmaya temple holds political and historical relevance with its connection to the Chauhan rulers and later Mughal rulers, including Bahadur Shah Zafar. Its links to Indian mythological traditions and spiritual philosophies underline its antiquity. At the same time, it remains a living site of worship reflecting the cultural landscape of Delhi and a witness to a shared legacy of syncretic festival traditions that developed during the Mughal period, such as Saie-e-Gulfaroshan. Architecturally, the temple is relatively modest, which highlights its continuity and the phases of reconstruction and adaptation over time.

In a nutshell, the Yogmaya Temple can be seen in the context of early Śākta and Yoginī traditions in the Delhi region that was once known as Yoginipura, prior to Islamic rule. The existence of Yogmaya as a sacred shrine of Shakti worship in Delhi shows the continuation of these traditions, adapted into mainstream devotional practices over time.

Figure 15 Yogmaya Temple Image Source: Poorvaa Malhotra Feb13,2026

Bibliography

Amazzone, L. (2016). Yoginis of Past and Present. Retrieved from Sutrajournal.com: http://www.sutrajournal.com/yoginis-of-past-and-present-by-laura-amazzone

Chawla, N. A. (n.d.). Yogini Goddesses in Delhi. Retrieved from Nooranandchawla: https://nooranandchawla.com/yogini-goddesses-in-delhi-artist-seema-kohli-a-circle-of-our-own-gallery-ragini/

Dehejia, V. (1986). Yogini Cult and Temples: A Tantric Tradition. New Delhi: National Museum .

Keshari, M. (2023). The Yogini of the Yoginipura: A Note About Two Unreported Early-Medieval Sculptures from Delhi. Quarterly Journal of The Mythic Society, 114.

Kumar, S. (2006). Delhi: City of Yoginis. Pilgrims Publishing.

Roy, A. (2015). Sixty-Four Yoginis: Cult, Icons and Goddesses. New Delhi: Primus Books.

Yogini Tempels. (n.d.). Retrieved from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogini_temples

Hindu Origins of Dome Architecture in India

By Poorvaa Malhotra

INTRODUCTION

It is widely believed that the history of dome architecture in India began by Muslim and Persian builders. Though the perfect structure of domes is definitely accredited to the later Islamic period. However, many historians and experts debate whether local Hindu builders were already attempting to create dome-like shapes on their own centuries before. Many ancient architectural treatises hint that Hindu builders were already experimenting with and creating vaulted structures. The dome like roofs of Hindu and Buddhist temples reveals the earlier instances of the rounded ceilings, some of them which are discussed in the article.

BACKGROUND HISTORY

The beginning of Islamic rule in India can be traced back to the 7th century CE when early Arab traders and merchants established contacts. It was followed by Turkic-Afghan constant invasions and conquests, notably those launched by Mahmud of Ghazni (11th Century), who carried out about seventeen raids into North India, plundering the wealth of temples (such as Somnath) and cities.  It was in the twelfth century CE when the Ghurid army led by Mu’izz ad-Din Muhammad ibn Sam, popularly known as Muhammad Ghori (c. 1144-1206 CE), defeated Prithviraj Chauhan and captured Delhi in the Second Battle of Tarrain (1192 CE) that marked the beginning of Islamic rule in North India. Ghori left his trusted slave-general Qutb-ud-din Aibak (1206-1210 CE) who then sets the foundation for the Delhi Sultanate by establishing the Mamluk/ Slave Dynasty (1206–1290 CE). He legitimized his rule by building the Quwwat-Ul-Islam Mosque (Might of Islam), the oldest surviving mosque in the Qutub complex, Mehrauli, Delhi, as a symbol of the declaration of Islamic power.

The Persian inscription found on the inner eastern gateway of the Quwwat ul Islam Mosque ( Jami’ Masjid) states that the mosque was built by Qutb-ud-daula Waddin, the Amir ul Umara Aibeg (i.e., Qutb-ud-din Aibak), a slave (Mamluk) of the Sultan Muhammad Ibn Sam, following the conquest of the fort (Lalkot/Qila-i-Rai Pithora) in 587 AH (1191-1192 CE). It further mentions that materials of 27 idol temples were used for the mosque’s construction —a practice that not only reflected political assertion but also gave rise to a distinct hybrid style, which later came to be known as Indo-Islamic architecture.

Figure 1 Inscription of Quwwat ul Islam Mosque, Source Indo Moslemica

DOMES: MEANING AND PURPOSE.

The Dome is an architectural element characterized by a hemispherical, curved, or bulbous roof that crowns buildings. The term “dome” derives from the Latin word domus, meaning “house” or “dwelling.” The word “Gumbad” (also spelled Gumbaz or Gumbat) is used as an equivalent term for Dome in Persian and Urdu. Similar to this, the ‘cupola’ is often used to denote a smaller dome or vaulted roof, typically placed atop a superstructure. In Hindu temple architecture, a curvilinear or tapering spire that crowns the garbhagriha (sanctum sanctorum) is called a Śikhara and the Vimāna used inthe Nagara (North Indian) style and the Dravida (South Indian) style of temple architecture respectively.

The purpose of building the hollow structures, like dome, was to regulate the temperature, keeping the interior of the building cool in summer and warm in winter. It also enhances the divine aura by allowing the sound to echo beautifully inside the sanctuary, helping devotees to immerse spiritually.

BUILDING TECHNIQUES

Ancient India has produced many architectural treatises, such as the Śilpa Śāstras with comprehensive knowledge on every aspect of the construction of buildings, from the choice of materials to directions, proportions, and ornamentation of essential structural components.

In pre-Mughal times, the dome-shaped structures generally had a square base with a lotus motif and bulbous finial at the top, as also seen in many Hindu temples. They were based on the trabeate (post-and-lintel system) in which domes were constructed by laying bricks in mortar in horizontal layers creating a tapering, conical, or curvilinear spire that gave stability to the structure and suited the Hindu architectural tradition, which did not employ arches or true domes.

The Islamic rulers introduced the arcuate principle to India, bringing with it the concept of the true arch and the true dome. It involves techniques like using iron dowels and cramps to strengthen the structure. Timber and bamboo were being employed to support the dome until the mortar set. Although the use of iron cramps was already being followed in pre-Islamic India mainly for the hoop reinforcement at the dome’s base, the Islamic rulers somehow refined these techniques, creating a grand structure that reflected the technical and cultural exchange between two architectural styles. (Ganvir, 2019)

TRACING HINDU ORIGINS OF DOME ARCHITECTURE

The Indo-Islamic architecture in India is a unique fusion of culture, faith and craftsmanship. One of its captivating and symbolic architectural elements is the domes—the crown of Mughal architecture. It enhances the grandeur of Mughal buildings including mosques, tombs, and palaces. Yet, long before the Mughals introduced their iconic bulbous domes, India had already mastered the art of the fundamental structure of domical shapes (both full hemispherical forms and cupola-like elements). They seem to be derived from pre-Islamic architectural practice including Hindu temples, Buddhist stupas, Jain shrines, and even early rock-cut caves. Moreover, references from ancient architectural treatises such as the Mānasāra and the Bṛhat Saṃhitā, along with archaeological evidence from stupas and early temple remains, reveals India’s timeless engineering skills.

Many scholars believe that domical forms predate Islamic influence by many centuries. Percy Brown in his Indian Architecture (Islamic Period), 1968 discussed about the use of Hindu temple materials to build the early Islamic mosques and tombs was ‘mainly a patch work of older materials, beautiful in detail, as its arcaded aisles were composed of pillars carved in the most perfect Hindu style, but as a whole a confused and somewhat incongruous improvisation’. The use of the corbelled arch system in Islamic buildings in India shows the distant architectural ancestry rooted in ancient Hindu and Buddhist traditions, tracing its lineage from the curved cave of village huts, through the rock-cut facades of the Barabar hills (2nd century B.C.) and the hemispherical stupa. (Brown, 1968). Similarly, in Delhi its story and buildings (1921) by H. Sharp, references how Hindu architectural elements likekalasha or ornate lotus-cresting’, were incorporated on the dome, thereby marking a development of the Indo-Islamic style

The earliest reference to the domes can be seen in Buddhist stupas as a central structure called Anda, which is the Hemispherical Dome and is constructed of baked bricks. Early rock-cut chaitya halls, such as those at Bhaja and Karli, developed from the stupa’s rounded form into curved, barrel-shaped ceilings showing the curved wooden and bas relief huts that were common in ancient India long before stone architecture became dominant. (Brown, 1959). In Hindu temple architecture, we find cupola like structures in stupika, kalasa mastaka, the crowning element that completes the vertical axis of the temple tower (śikhara or vimāna). This element typically culminates in a disc-like amalaka and a pot-shaped kalasha—both representing fertility, cosmic energy, and divinity. In addition to this, the Sikh architectural tradition depicts the dome in the Gurdwaras such as Harmandir Sahib (Golden Temple) in Amritsar, Gurdwara Sheesh Mahal in Kiratpur etc., featuring lustrous domes with floral bases like inverted lotus motifs.

There are many primary textual sources belonging to ancient India which give details for these domes or stūpi. Sanskrit treatises on architecture—the Vāstu Śāstras, Śilpa Śāstras, Manasara,  Agni-purana, Vişnu-dharmottara-purāņa, Kasyapasilpa, Mayamataare foundational to understanding the Hindu architecture, sculpture, iconography, and painting.

Varāhamihira’s Brihat Samhita (c. 6th Century CE): This Sanskrit work by Varāhamihira covers themes like astrology, architecture, and other sciences. It gives the chief categories of temples in India in its chapter on vāstu (architecture), viz Nagara (North Indian), Dravida (South Indian), and Vesara (a hybrid). The Chapter 56 (Prāsāda-lakṣaṇa) then mentions the instructions for constructing the temples and lists twenty distinct types of temples among which Mandara, Kailāsa, Nandana having multiple śikhara (towers) and stūpis (domes or cupolas) such as The Sarvatobhadra has four doors and many domes (bahuśikhara); the Nandana has six storeys and sixteen cupolas. Thisindicates that domes were integral to Hindu temple architecture long before the introduction of Islamic arches and true vaulting.

The Mānasāra Śilpa Śāstra (c. 5th-7th Century CE): This text is one of most comprehensive treatises on Indian architecture with 70 adhyayas (chapters) and 10,000 shlokas (verses). Discovered by P.K. Acharya, Manasara (essence of measurement) talks about the construction plans of temple. In its chapter 18 (Vimana-laksana) it describes stūpi/stūpikā as “dome-like” or spherical superstructure placed above the vimāna and is circular or quadrangular in shape (v. 90-91). It suggests that “The edifice should be furnished with domes (stūpikās)—three, two, or one in number”(v. 92)

For reference

Ajitāgama (XIV.64cd–65ab): The Ajitāgama is a Āgama text (Śaiva tradition) that locates the gala (the neck) is placed above the prastara (the temple’s entablature) and resting on a vedikā (base).

galaṃ syāt prastaropari |
tanmūle vedikāṃ kuryāt tasya lakṣaṇam ucyate ||

 This section forms the foundation for the dome-like or finial element (stūpi, kumbha, kalasha). The gala acts as a drum between the tower and the upper dome showing a precursor to the dome-drum system.

Kāśyapa Śilpaśāstra (XIX.6) mentions the different geometric bases for the upper crowning element (stūpi/śikhara) which is square (vedāśraṃ) in Nāgara temples, octagonal (vasvaśraṃ) in Drāviḍa, and circular (vṛttaṃ) in Vesara. The circular and octangle base might later became a part of Indo-Islamic and Indo-Saracenic domes.

vedāśraṃ nāgare kaṇṭhaṃ vasvaśraṃ draviḍe galam |
vṛttaṃ tu vesare harmye galamānākulaṃ nayet ||

 Kāmikāgama (I.58.1cd) suggests the idea of padma (lotus base) that supports a bulbous, dome-like sthūpi a dominant feature seen in many domes in later centuries. The verse padmoccaṃ vārdhabhāgo vā tadūrdhve sthūpikāyatiḥ tells that the height of the sthūpikā should be equal to or half the height of the lotus (padma) below it.

 Vṛkṣārṇava (Maru-Gurjara, c. 15th century CE): A late medieval Vāstu text that in which there is a chapter on Rehamāṇa-Prāsāda (the temple of Rehamāņa,i.e,, Allah ) that shows how to build mosques according to Hindu Vāstu principles. The text treats mosque construction as part of the same architectural system as Hindu temples and other buildings.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND MONUMENTAL EVIDENCE

Early Domed Huts and the Origin of Rock-Cut architecture in India

According to Percy Brown in his Indian Architecture, the earliest buildings were made from perishable material bamboo, timber and reeds. These huts had round, dome-shaped roofs that helped to keep out rain and protect what was stored inside. Such forms are still seen in Indian villages today in small round huts called chhappar or bitaura, used to store cow-dung cakes or grains.

Figure 2 Bas Relief Domed huts, Percy Brown

These were later developed in the rock-cut caves of the Mauryan period (3rd century BCE) at Barabar Hills and Nagarjuni in Bihar. Caves such as the Lomas Rishi show arched façades and vaulted or domed interiors, carved directly into rock. These rock-cut “chaitya halls” (prayer halls) were direct imitations of the older wooden and thatched huts. Later examples, like the chaitya halls at Bhaja, Karla, and Ajanta, continued this tradition with barrel-vaulted roofs and arched ceilings. These monuments prove that the idea of domed and vaulted spaces in Indian architecture began long before Islamic influence.

Figure 3 Bhaja Caves,Source: http://dharma-records.buddhasasana.net/photos/bhaja-caves-lonavala-india

Buddhist Stupas

The stupas are the funerary mound made of bricks which is hemispherical in shape called anda. In the Kūṭāgāra Sutta (Saṃyutta Nikāya V.75), the Buddha uses the image of a roofed pavilion (kūṭāgāra) to describe spiritual practice:

“Just as all the rafters of a roof incline, slope, and converge at the peak,
so too the seven factors of enlightenment incline and converge upon Nibbāna.”

Figure 4Elevation of the Stupa (https://www.wisdomlib.org/gallery/new-delhi-maurya-arts/8816)

It suggests the architectural visual of a kūṭāgāra—literally “a peaked or domed tower”—is used as a metaphor for spiritual understanding of attaining nibbana which holds similar symbolism in domes constructed by Islamic rulers. The Great Stupa at Sanchi, founded under Ashoka (3rd c. BCE)in Madhya Pradesh depicts the full dome like structure in its centre which is crowned with Chhatra (Umbrella) at the top.

Figure 5 The Great Stupa at Sanchi (Source: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Buddhism)

Figure 6 Various forms of Stupas, Percy Brown

Circular temple at Bairat, Jaipur, C. 2nd century BCE

This circular shaped temple is Chaityagriha dedicated to Buddhism and located on the hills of Bijak-ki-Pahari (lit. ’Hill of the Inscription’) in Rajasthan. It is named so as we have found two important Minor Rock Edicts of Asoka. The city Bairat holds great significance and it was known as Viratpura, the capital of King Virat.  Today, only the stone base and foundation walls of the structure survive. However, based on these remains that were excavated by Rai Bahadaur Daya Ram Sahani, scholars and art historians including Percy Brown have reconstructed it as a domed structure, suggesting that it originally had a dome-shaped roof supported by wooden pillars.

Figure 7 Bairat Temple, Percy Brown

The Bhitargaon temple (c. 5th Century CE, Gupta Period)

Figure 8 Bhitargaon Temple (Source: https://kanpurnagar.nic.in/gallery/bhitargaon-bricks-temple/)

Located in Uttar Pradesh, Bhitargaon temple is the oldest surviving Nagar style temple from Gupta period. It was discovered by Alexander Cunnigham in 1877 who mentioned that the locals called this temple as Deval meaning shrine. Later, it was surveyed by Archaeologists such as J.P Vogel(1907) A.H Longhurst (1909). It is remarkable to notice that the Shikhara (tower) of the temple is built with semi-circular vaults and pointed domes instead of simple flat roofs. It was observed that the porch (ardhamandapa) and the sanctum (garbhagriha) had vaulted arched ceilings showing the use of true arches. Another feature of this temple is that the Shikhara is hollow inside and is build using the “double-dome system” . The hollow space reduced the weight of the upper structure while giving the temple greater height and a grander appearance. (Zaheer, 1981) The use of techniques like corbelling, true arches and double domes shows an early form of arcuate construction in temple architecture long before Islamic influence reached India.

Figure 9Double dome technique used in Bhitargaon Temple. (Zaheer 1981)

CONCLUSION

Contrary to the popular notion that dome architecture was introduced by Islamic rulers, it is noted that domical forms were already being practiced since ancient times by the Indians. It was a part of vocabulary in many architectural treatises depicting its earliest representation in domed huts and  stupas  to the crown of temple architecture. Although the fundamental structure of dome true domes and arches were a part of arcuate architectural tradition, the central idea of the dome remains the same in every culture. It symbolised the cosmic mound that embodies Mount Meru connecting earth to heaven.

In conclusion, domes as shapes and symbols have deep roots in India’s pre-Islamic architectural and textual traditions. The technological innovations of Persian and Timurid engineering assimilated with Indigenous craftsmanshipto create a distinctive style of Indo Islamic architecture.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Acharya, P. K. (1933). Manasara (English Translation).

Brown, P. (1959). Indian architecture: (Buddhist and Hindu periods). D.B. Taraporevala, Bombay.

Brown, P. (1968). Indian Architecture (Islaamic Period). Taraporevala’s Treasure House of Books.

Ganvir, A. L. (2019, Aril-May). A Comprehensive Study of Evolution of Domes in Indo- Islamic Architecture. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Technology, 6(2), 88-90.

Kashyapa Shilpashastra. (n.d.). Retrieved from Wisdom Library: https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/essay/kashyapa-shilpa-shastra-study

Kumar, S. D. (2015). Building science of ancient Indian temples. International Journal of Engineering Sciences Paradigms and Research.

Zaheer, M. (1981). The Temple of Bhitargaon (1 ed.). Delhi: Agam Kala Prakashan.

Humayun Tomb

Humayun’s Tomb: A Mughal Marvel

 

Humayun’s Tomb, located in Delhi, is an architectural masterpiece and a precursor to the Taj Mahal. Built between 1565 and 1572 CE by Empress Bega Begum, it is the first grand Mughal mausoleum in India and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. This monument serves as the final resting place of Emperor Humayun. But do the architectural features cast doubt on the temple’s architectural influences?

humayun's tomb

Historical Background

Humayun, the second ruler of the Mughal dynasty, faced a turbulent reign marked by defeat, exile, and eventual return. After losing his empire to Sher Shah Suri, he regained the throne but died unexpectedly in 1556 CE. His widow, Bega Begum (Haji Begum), undertook the responsibility of building a magnificent tomb in his honor. She personally supervised the construction and even travelled to Mecca for Hajj, further emphasizing the tomb’s significance as a spiritual monument.

humayun's tomb

Designed by Persian architect Mirak Mirza Ghiyas, the tomb was constructed on the banks of the Yamuna, some architectural elements reflect Indian (Hindu temple) influences, likely due to the involvement of local craftsmen and artisans.

humayun's tomb

Architectural Features

Humayun’s Tomb was a ground breaking structure in the evolution of Mughal architecture, introducing several elements that later inspired the Taj Mahal. It was the first garden tomb in India, marking a departure from earlier Mughal invasion-era tombs.

humayun's tomb

Key Features:

  • Double-Domed Structure: The massive white dome sits on an octagonal drum, creating a grand visual impact.
    humayun's tomb
  • Charbagh Garden Layout: The tomb is set within a Persian-style Charbagh, a four-part garden layout symbolizing paradise in Islamic tradition.humayun's tomb
  • Red Sandstone and Marble Inlay: The tomb is built using red sandstone with intricate white and black marble inlays, showcasing exquisite craftsmanship.
  • High Arches and Vaulted Entrances: The structure features monumental iwans (arched entrances) on all four sides, a hallmark of Persian and Timurid architecture.humayun's tomb
  • Ornamental Chhatris (Pavilion-Like Domes): Small domed pavilions, typically found in Rajput and Hindu temple architecture, decorate the tomb’s roof.humayun's tomb
  • Jali Screens and Calligraphy: The delicate stone lattice screens (jali work) allow light and air to pass through while adding an aesthetic touch. These screens, though an Islamic feature, bear resemblance to carvings found in earlier Indian temples.humayun's tomb

Hindu Temple Influences incorporated in the Design

While Humayun’s Tomb is fundamentally an Islamic funerary structure, many architectural elements suggest pre-Islamic Indian influences:

humayun's tomb

  1. Raised Platform: The entire structure is elevated on a massive plinth, similar to Hindu temple foundations that signifies sacredness. The massive gateway (pishtaq) echoes Persian designs but is also reminiscent of monumental Hindu temple entrances.
    humayun's tomb
  2. Chhatris (Pavilion-Like Domes): Typically associated with Rajput architecture, these are seen on the tomb’s upper structure commonly seen in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. These were not typically found in Persian tombs but became a signature of Indo influenced architecture.
    humayun's tomb
  3. Red Sandstone Construction: The patterns carved into the red sandstone facades resemble motifs found in Hindu and Jain temples. The extensive use of red sandstone with white marble inlays resembles materials used in early Hindu and Jain temples, such as those in Rajasthan and Gujarat.                        Persian structures mainly favored baked bricks and tiles, but invaded Mughal buildings incorporated indigenous Indian materials.humayun's tomb
  4. Vastu-Based Symmetry: The perfect alignment of the Charbagh gardens and tomb structure follows some Vastu Shastra principles, indicating an influence of Indian architectural traditions.humayun's tomb

While there is no concrete evidence that Humayun’s Tomb was built on a pre-existing Hindu structure, its fusion of Indian and Persian elements reflects highly influential use of great Indian architeural designs, which was populary found all over the state but was later invaded, destroyed and converted over time.

humayun's tomb

Decline and Restoration

Over the centuries, Humayun’s Tomb witnessed periods of neglect and deterioration, particularly during British rule. The once-meticulously maintained Charbagh gardens were replaced by an English-style garden, altering the original Indo-Persian aesthetic.

humayun's tomb

By the 20th century, the tomb had lost much of its grandeur, prompting conservation efforts. Major restoration work began under the supervision of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), with further revitalization undertaken by INTACH and the Aga Khan Trust for Culture in collaboration with UNESCO. These efforts focused on removing later additions, restoring the original Charbagh layout, and reinforcing structural integrity.

humayun's tomb

Today, after conservation, Humayun’s Tomb stands restored, and there lies a possibility, that alterations of ancient elements might have been removed or changed completely and the original influence might not be visible to the current viewers. Though there are no official reports on the same but a possiblity remains in the corner.

humayun's tomb

 

Neela Gumbad (Humayun Tomb Complex)

 

Neela Gumbad, located within the Humayun’s Tomb complex in Delhi, is an architectural marvel from the Mughal invasion era, distinguished by its striking blue-tiled dome. Built in the late 16th or early 17th century, it is believed to be the tomb of a Mughal noble, though historical records do not definitively confirm the identity of the individual buried within. The monument is among the earliest examples of glazed tile decoration in India, and being influenced by the Indian architectural elements.

neela gumbad

Architectural Features of Neela Gumbad

neela gumbad

Dome and Facade

  • The most distinctive feature of Neela Gumbad is its vivid blue-tiled dome, which gives the monument its name. The use of Persian-style glazed tiles was relatively rare in India at the time, making this structure an early example of this technique.
  • The dome sits on a square chamber with an octagonal drum, a form frequently seen in Islamic funerary architecture.
  • The exterior walls are decorated with remnants of geometric and floral tilework, adding to its aesthetic appeal.neela gumbad

Interior Design

  • The interior of Neela Gumbad is relatively plain, with remnants of stucco plasterwork that once adorned its walls.neela gumbad
  • The absence of elaborate calligraphy and Quranic inscriptions, typical of Mughal tombs, suggests a more localized influence in its design.neela gumbad

Hindu Architectural Influences

While Neela Gumbad is predominantly an Islamic funerary monument, there are certain architectural features that hint at pre-Islamic Indian influences:

neela gumbad

  1. Bracketed Eaves (Chhajjas): These overhanging eaves, commonly found in Hindu and Rajput architecture, are present in the structure.
    neela gumbad
  2. Ornamental Carvings: Some of the floral patterns resemble traditional Hindu temple motifs, indicating the involvement of local artisans.neela gumbad
  3. Octagonal Plan Similarity: The eight-sided structure is reminiscent of stepwell and mandapa designs seen in earlier Hindu architecture.neela gumbad

Historical Significance

Neela Gumbad was constructed around the same time as Humayun’s Tomb (mid to late 16th century), making it one of the earliest Mughal-era structures in Delhi. The use of Persian tilework and traditional Indian elements reflects the cultural influence from the land. It remains one of the most visually unique tombs in the Humayun’s Tomb complex.

neela gumbad

Conclusion

Neela Gumbad stands as a testament to the rich architectural diversity of the ancient period, incorporating elements of Persian, Timurid, and Indian craftsmanship. While primarily an Islamic funerary structure, the presence of Hindu-style brackets and floral motifs highlights the blending of artistic traditions in medieval India. Today, Neela Gumbad remains a fascinating yet often overlooked structure, offering insight into the evolution of Indo-Islamic architecture.

neela gumbad

neela gumbad

Kali Gumti, Hauz Khas

Introduction

Kali Gumti, nestled within the serene surroundings of Deer Park in Hauz Khas, Delhi, is a lesser-known yet historically significant monument. This medieval structure is a striking example of Indo-Islamic architecture, reflecting the artistic and cultural advancements of the Delhi Sultanate period. Despite its historical importance, Kali Gumti has suffered from neglect and vandalism, with graffiti and carvings marring its original beauty. This article delves into its history, influenced architectural features, and the modern challenges it faces.

kali gumti

Historical Background

Kali Gumti is believed to have been constructed during the reign of the Lodi or Tughlaq dynasties (14th–15th century), a period known for its impressive architectural innovations. The structure likely served as a tomb or a gateway, contributing to the urban fabric of medieval Delhi. Hauz Khas, meaning “Royal Tank,” was an important hub during the Delhi Sultanate, with several monuments and structures built around the large water reservoir originally commissioned by Alauddin Khalji in the late 13th century.

kali gumti

Over the centuries, the surrounding area of Hauz Khas evolved, with the Tughlaqs and later dynasties adding madrasas, tombs, and pavilions to create a vibrant center of learning and administration. Kali Gumti, though smaller in scale compared to the nearby Hauz Khas monuments, has fated its way into being in an abondoned condition where the visitors have sprayed graffitis and vandalised the ancient structure.

kali gumti

Architectural Features

Kali Gumti exhibits several key elements of Indo-Islamic architecture, including:

  • Simple Design: Unlike grander structures of the period, Kali Gumti is characterized by a minimalist yet elegant design, typical of tombs and smaller pavilions of the time.
  • Pointed Arches: The structure features pointed arches, a hallmark of Islamic architecture, providing both aesthetic appeal and structural stability.
  • Domed Roof: A significant feature of Islamic tomb architecture, the dome of Kali Gumti reflects Persian and Afghan influences.
  • Thick Stone Walls: Built with locally available stone, the monument showcases the durability and craftsmanship of medieval builders.
  • Carved Niches and Minimal Ornamentation: Unlike larger tombs and mosques, Kali Gumti has relatively simple decoration, with a focus on geometric patterns and calligraphy.

kali gumti

Vandalism and Modern-Day Damage

Despite its historical and architectural significance, Kali Gumti has become a victim of neglect and vandalism. Over the years, visitors have defaced the monument by carving their names onto its walls and spray-painting graffiti, diminishing its authenticity. These unsanctioned markings obscure the original craftsmanship and contribute to the degradation of the structure.

kali gumti

Lack of maintenance and awareness about heritage preservation has further worsened the condition of the monument. Encroachment and unchecked visitor activities have resulted in making the monument vulnerable to further deterioration

kali gumti

While the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and local heritage organizations have undertaken some conservation projects in Hauz Khas, structures like Kali Gumti often receive less attention than larger monuments.

kali gumti

Conclusion

Kali Gumti, a quiet yet significant structure in Deer Park, Hauz Khas, is a reminder of Delhi’s medieval past. However, its historical monument is being overshadowed by vandalism and neglect.

kali gumti

 

Kale Khan Ka Gumbad

Kale Khan Ka Gumbad: A Possible Converted Monument

Kale Khan Ka Gumbad, a 16th-century tomb located in Delhi, believed to belong to an individual named Kale Khan, though historical records provide little clarity about his identity. This Lodhi-era structure is an example of early Indo-Islamic architecture, featuring a blend of Persian, Afghan, and Indian influences. Positioned within the historical complex of Nizamuddin, the monument often goes unnoticed despite its architectural significance.

Notably, historian Sita Ram Goel listed Kale Khan Ka Gumbad among monuments that he argued were built over pre-existing Hindu temple sites. Given the historical context of temple demolitions and repurposing of structures during the medieval period, this claim raises important questions. Elements such as the raised plinth, potential reuse of temple materials, and stylistic influences like chhatris (domed pavilions) suggest that the tomb may have incorporated remnants of an earlier Hindu shrine.

kale khan ka gumbad

Architectural Features of Kale Khan Ka Gumbad

The tomb follows the octagonal plan typical of the Lodhi dynasty, topped with a massive hemispherical dome. Constructed primarily of Delhi quartzite and red sandstone, it features arched entrances on all sides, reflecting the characteristic simplicity of Lodhi-era tombs. The structure also includes intricate jali (lattice) work, decorative medallions, and remnants of floral motifs.

kale khan ka gumbad

Key Architectural Elements:

  • Dome and Squared Base: The large dome rests on a raised platform, supported by squinches and pendentives—typical features of early Ancient Indian structures influenced Islamic architecture in India.
  • Pointed Arches and Minimal Ornamentation: Unlike later Mughal tombs, which had elaborate designs, Kale Khan Ka Gumbad maintains a modest aesthetic, focused on structural strength.kale khan ka gumbad
  • Use of Chhajjas and Brackets: These overhanging eaves are reminiscent of earlier Indian temple architecture, hinting at indigenous influences in Islamic structures.

Hindu Architectural Influences

While built as an Islamic tomb, some architectural features of Kale Khan Ka Gumbad reflect pre-Islamic inavasion Indian elements:

kale khan ka gumbad

  1. Corbelled Brackets and Chhajjas: These overhanging eaves resemble traditional Hindu and Rajput architectural features found in temples and palaces.
  2. Floral and Geometric Designs: The remnants of decorative motifs bear similarities to Hindu carvings, which often emphasized nature-based patterns.kale khan ka gumbad
  3. Material Use and Construction Style: The tomb’s construction techniques show similarities to pre-Islamic invasion stone masonry methods, possibly hinting at skilled Hindu artisans working on the monument.kale khan ka gumbad

Historical Significance and Legacy

Built during the Lodhi period (1451–1526 CE), Kale Khan Ka Gumbad is an example of the transition between Delhi Sultanate architecture and the later Mughal style. The structure reflects the simplicity of Lodhi tombs while incorporating indigenous architectural traditions. Today, the tomb remains a lesser-known monument, overshadowed by grander structures in Delhi.

kale khan ka gumbad

Conclusion

Kale Khan Ka Gumbad is a fascinating piece of Delhi’s architectural history, showcasing the fusion of Indo-Islamic and indigenous Hindu elements. Whether these influences are due to repurposed materials, skilled Indian artisans, or a deeper cultural exchange, they highlight how architectural styles evolved in medieval India. Preserving such monuments and conducting further research to find out the actual primary monument is necessary. The authentic research is required also because the society must understand and accept the results of the islamic invasion which has marked a hard blow to all the suffered Hindus and the temples.

kale khan ka gumbad

Jantar Mantar

Jantar Mantar: An Astronomical Marvel of the 18th Century

Jantar Mantar in Delhi is one of five astronomical observatories built by Maharaja Jai Singh II of Jaipur in 1724. Designed to aid in the precise measurement of celestial movements, this observatory was an ambitious scientific project that sought to refine astronomical calculations and improve timekeeping. The name “Jantar Mantar” is derived from the Sanskrit words “Yantra” (instrument) and “Mantra” (formula or calculation), symbolizing its function as an advanced astronomical tool.

Architectural and Scientific Significance

Unlike traditional buildings, Jantar Mantar is a collection of massive geometric instruments crafted from stone and masonry, each serving a distinct purpose in astronomical observations. The key instruments include:

  1. Samrat Yantra – A giant sundial that measures time with remarkable accuracy, capable of recording time to an accuracy of 2 seconds.

  2. Jai Prakash Yantra – A hemispherical structure with markings that help determine celestial altitudes and positions.
  3. Misra Yantra – A complex instrument designed to determine the longest and shortest days of the year, as well as the exact moment of noon in various cities worldwide.

  4. Rama Yantra – Used to measure the altitude and azimuth of celestial bodies.

Each of these instruments was built to function without the use of telescopes, relying entirely on shadows and alignments to track planetary and solar movements.

Purpose and Historical Context

Maharaja Jai Singh II, an ardent scholar of astronomy, constructed Jantar Mantar to improve upon existing astronomical tables and correct errors in planetary positions recorded in earlier texts. The observatory was built at a time when Indian astronomy had fallen behind advancements in the Islamic and European worlds. Jai Singh’s initiative sought to revive and modernize India’s astronomical studies, ensuring more precise celestial predictions for astrological, navigational, and administrative purposes.

Jantar Mantar in Delhi was the first of the five observatories he built, followed by those in Jaipur, Ujjain, Varanasi, and Mathura. These observatories played a crucial role in reforming the Indian calendar, refining astrological predictions, and aiding in timekeeping for religious and governmental functions.

Legacy and Preservation

Jantar Mantar remains an architectural and scientific wonder, attracting historians, scientists, and tourists alike. Despite its brilliance, many of its functions have become obsolete with the advent of modern astronomical instruments. However, it stands today as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, preserving the legacy of Jai Singh II’s scientific advancements.

Conclusion

Jantar Mantar is more than just a collection of stone instruments—it is a symbol of India’s historical contributions to astronomy. Its unique design and purpose demonstrate the scientific spirit of the 18th century and the ambition of Maharaja Jai Singh II to bring precision and accuracy to celestial calculations. Today, it serves as an enduring reminder of India’s rich heritage in astronomical studies and architectural innovation.

 

Jamali Kamali

Jamali Kamali: A Monument Shrouded in Mystery and Architectural Enigma

Nestled within the Mehrauli Archaeological Park, the Jamali Kamali Mosque and Tomb stand as an exquisite yet enigmatic structure from the Mughal era (16th century). The monument is named after the Sufi saint and poet Sheikh Fazlullah, known as Jamali, and an unknown figure referred to as Kamali, whose identity remains a mystery. While officially regarded as an Islamic structure, several architectural elements within the complex hint at possible pre-Islamic origins, leading to speculation that it might have been built over an earlier Hindu site.

Architectural Brilliance of Jamali Kamali

The complex consists of two main structures: the mosque and the tomb, both exhibiting exquisite red sandstone and marble craftsmanship. The mosque features intricate floral motifs, geometric designs, and calligraphy, while the tomb houses an ornately decorated chamber adorned with glazed tilework and Persian inscriptions.

Key Architectural Features:

  1. Ornate Arches and Domes: The arches display a fusion of Indo-Islamic styles, yet certain decorative elements bear similarities to Hindu temple carvings.
  2. Eaves (Chhajja) and Pillars: The overhanging eaves, supported by carved brackets, bear resemblance to those in Hindu and Jain temples.
  3. Floral and Lotus Motifs: Hindu temple iconography often includes lotus and floral engravings, some of which appear subtly within the tomb and mosque interiors.
  4. Use of Spolia: Several stones and carved elements appear repurposed, hinting at materials taken from pre-existing Hindu structures.
  5. Oriented Courtyard Layout: While mosques typically align towards Mecca, some aspects of the open courtyard and pillar placements suggest possible modifications from an earlier structure.

Hindu Temple Influences and Possible Pre-Islamic Past

Despite being a celebrated Mughal-era site, certain features raise questions about its origins:

  1. Reused Materials: Many medieval Islamic structures in Delhi, including the Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque, were built using stones and pillars from dismantled Hindu and Jain temples. Similar signs can be seen at Jamali Kamali.
  2. Architectural Continuity: The integration of Hindu-style brackets, eaves, and lotus motifs suggests the involvement of artisans familiar with temple architecture.
  3. Absence of Clear Historical Records: Unlike other prominent Mughal structures, there is little documentation on the original foundation of Jamali Kamali, leaving room for speculation.

The Supernatural Mystique of Jamali Kamali

Adding to its intrigue, Jamali Kamali is considered one of Delhi’s most haunted sites. Many visitors have reported eerie experiences, from whispers and shadows to inexplicable sensations. The presence of an unverified burial (Kamali’s identity remains unknown) further fuels speculation about the site’s mysterious past.

Conclusion

The Jamali Kamali Mosque and Tomb remain a fascinating example of Indo-Islamic architecture, but their subtle Hindu influences and reused architectural elements open up possibilities of a pre-existing sacred site. While it stands today as an important Mughal-era monument, further archaeological and historical investigations might uncover layers of history hidden beneath its striking facade. Whether it was built over a former Hindu temple or simply incorporated elements from one, Jamali Kamali continues to be one of Delhi’s most intriguing historical enigmas.


Dadi Poti’s Tombs

Dadi Poti’s Tombs: A Forgotten Legacy with Echoes of a Hindu Past

Nestled within the historic fabric of Delhi, Dadi Poti’s Tombs are a pair of enigmatic structures attributed to the Lodhi-era (15th century). These tombs, smaller in scale yet architecturally intriguing, stand as silent sentinels of a past that may hold deeper layers of history than their current Islamic identity suggests. The presence of Hindu temple elements in their construction raises the possibility that these tombs were built over an earlier sacred site, repurposing existing structures or materials.

dadi poti tombs hauz khas

Architectural Features of Dadi Poti’s Tombs

The two tombs, colloquially referred to as Dadi (grandmother) and Poti (granddaughter), differ in size but share common architectural characteristics of Indo-Islamic design. Constructed using rubble masonry, they exhibit pointed arches, domes, and symmetrical layouts, elements synonymous with Sultanate-era tombs.

Key Architectural Elements:

  1. Dome Structure: The larger tomb (Dadi) has a more elaborate dome, while the smaller one (Poti) is simpler but follows similar construction techniques.
  2. Arched Entrances: The entrances bear clear Indo-Islamic influences, yet some of the detailing suggests pre-existing structural elements.

  3. Eaves (Chhajja) and Brackets: The stone eaves resemble Hindu temple canopies, a feature seen in pre-Islamic architecture.

  4. Carved Details: Subtle floral and geometric patterns bear resemblance to Hindu temple motifs, suggesting either an adaptation or the use of salvaged material.

    choti gumti hauz khas

Hindu Temple Influences and Possible Pre-Islamic Origins

Despite being recognized as Islamic tombs, various architectural cues hint at a possible Hindu origin:

  1. Floral and Lotus Motifs: Hindu temples prominently use lotus symbols, and faint traces of such designs can be observed in the tomb’s stonework.
  2. Use of Spolia: The possibility of recycled temple material in the construction aligns with the historical precedent of Sultanate structures incorporating elements from earlier Hindu and Jain sites.

  3. Structural Orientation: While Islamic tombs are often oriented towards Mecca, some aspects of these tombs’ layouts suggest an adaptation of an earlier sacred structure rather than an entirely new construction.
  4. Absence of Inscriptions: Unlike grander Islamic tombs, these structures lack extensive inscriptions, leaving gaps in their definitive historical narrative and allowing speculation about their original purpose.


    choti gumti hauz khas

A Silent Testament to Delhi’s Evolving Landscape

Dadi Poti’s Tombs stand as remnants of Delhi’s ever-evolving architectural and cultural landscape. Their presence, alongside other medieval structures, highlights the city’s long history of transformation, adaptation, and religious intermingling. Whether these tombs were built over a pre-existing Hindu site or simply integrated elements from one, they remain a fascinating case for further exploration.

Conclusion

Though modest in scale, Dadi Poti’s Tombs embody an intriguing historical puzzle. Their Islamic identity is undeniable, yet subtle traces of Hindu influence—from floral motifs to reused architectural elements—spark curiosity about their true origins. Whether they stand over an earlier Hindu religious site or simply borrowed from one, these tombs add to Delhi’s rich tapestry of layered histories, waiting to be uncovered by deeper archaeological and scholarly inquiry.

Choti Gumti

Choti Gumti: An Overlooked Jewel of Hauz Khas

Tucked away in the historic precincts of Hauz Khas, Choti Gumti is a small yet architecturally significant monument dating back to the Lodhi-era (15th century). Despite its modest size, this tomb carries historical and cultural importance, adding to the medieval charm of Delhi. Though often overshadowed by grander structures, Choti Gumti’s design and construction hint at a layered past that may predate its Islamic identity.

choti gumti hauz khas

Architectural Features of Choti Gumti

Built using rubble masonry, Choti Gumti follows a simple yet elegant design that is characteristic of Lodhi-era tombs. It features a square base, topped with a hemispherical dome, creating a striking yet understated aesthetic. The tomb has three arched entrances, with one wall sealed off, possibly housing a mihrab (prayer niche).

choti gumti hauz khas

Key Architectural Elements:

  1. Dome with Finial: The large central dome gives the structure a majestic appearance, typical of Lodhi-era tombs.
  2. Arched Entrances: The pointed arches showcase Indo-Islamic influences, yet some detailing hints at earlier architectural traditions.
  3. Eaves (Chhajja): The overhanging eaves resemble those found in temple structures, suggesting possible Hindu artisan involvement in construction.
  4. Decorative Elements: The brackets and some stonework bear stylistic similarities to Hindu temple architecture, raising the possibility of repurposed material.

    choti gumti hauz khas

Hindu Temple Influences and Possible Pre-Islamic Past

While officially classified as an Islamic tomb, certain features of Choti Gumti suggest a possible Hindu origin:

  1. Floral and Lotus Motifs: Hindu temples prominently use lotus symbols, some of which appear faintly in the decorative elements of Choti Gumti.
  2. Use of Spolia: Many Lodhi-era structures, including those in Mehrauli and Hauz Khas, reused material from older Hindu and Jain temples.
  3. Alignment with Vastu Shastra: Hindu temple structures follow sacred geometry, and certain elements of Choti Gumti’s layout hint at an earlier structure’s adaptation.
  4. Historical Precedent: Several Islamic monuments in Delhi, including the Quwwat-ul-Islam Mosque, were built using material from demolished temples. Choti Gumti might follow a similar historical pattern.

    choti gumti hauz khas

Choti Gumti’s Role in the Hauz Khas Landscape

Positioned in the Hauz Khas area, which was once a significant medieval center, Choti Gumti adds to the rich architectural legacy of the region. Its presence, along with other tombs and structures from the Delhi Sultanate, reflects the political and cultural shifts that shaped Delhi’s landscape over centuries.

choti gumti hauz khas

Conclusion

Choti Gumti, though a small structure, carries an immense historical enigma. Officially considered a Lodhi-era tomb, its subtle Hindu influences and architectural anomalies suggest a more complex history—possibly tied to a pre-Islamic past. Whether it was built over an existing Hindu site or simply incorporated Hindu elements remains a mystery, one that requires deeper archaeological study to unravel the full story of this forgotten gem in Hauz Khas.

choti gumti hauz khas